2010
DOI: 10.1086/650562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Light on Long‐Distance Ties in the Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Near East

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one accepts the Aruchlo I bead as non-intrusive, it demonstrates the possibility of the extraction and use of natural tin-copper alloys as early as the 6 th millennium CalBC. This, in turn, also opens the possibility that the item from Tel Tsaf was made from a natural tin-copper source and transported to the Jordan Valley via long-distance exchange networks, which also brought obsidian, groundstone items and other goods from Armenia, Anatolia and Syria through the Levantine Corridor [44] . If this is the case, then the copper awl from Tel Tsaf could have reached the site through exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one accepts the Aruchlo I bead as non-intrusive, it demonstrates the possibility of the extraction and use of natural tin-copper alloys as early as the 6 th millennium CalBC. This, in turn, also opens the possibility that the item from Tel Tsaf was made from a natural tin-copper source and transported to the Jordan Valley via long-distance exchange networks, which also brought obsidian, groundstone items and other goods from Armenia, Anatolia and Syria through the Levantine Corridor [44] . If this is the case, then the copper awl from Tel Tsaf could have reached the site through exchange.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eastern Upper Galilee and the northern Jordan Valley host many important prehistoric sites, including the Lower Palaeolithic site of Gesher Benot Ya’aqov (Goren‐Inbar et al, ), and the Middle Palaeolithic site of Nahal Amud Cave (Hovers, Rak, Lavi, & Kimbel, ; Suzuki & Takai, ; see Figure ), and the archaeologically rich Neolithic/Chalcolithic sites of Beisamoun (Barkai, ; Bocquentin, Barzilai, Khalaily, & Kolska Horwitz, ; Lechevallier, ; Rosenberg, Assaf, Getzov, & Gopher, ) and Hagoshrim (Barkai, , p. 76; Getzov, ; Rosenberg, Getzov, & Assaf, ; Rosenberg et al, ). All of these sites and many more (mentioned below) contain extensive flint assemblages; however, research efforts aimed at locating flint sources are inconclusive and only point to geological outcrops in the area (Delage, , , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dishon area 10 km to the west of the Naftali Hills is the closest Eocene formation. In this study, we sampled broken axes. Hagoshrim (“G” in Figure located 17 km northeast of the Dishon complex): This is a Neolithic (Prepottery Neolithic C and Pottery Neolithic) and Chalcolithic site that yielded 6,854 bifacial tools through a survey (Barkai, , p. 76) and more were recovered during excavations (Getzov, ; Rosenberg et al, , ). In this study, we sampled adzes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005; Dillian & White 2010; Rosenberg et al . 2010). Here, understanding the distribution of raw material sources is essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%