2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New lessons from the H i size–mass relation of galaxies

Abstract: We revisit the Hi size-mass (D HI -M HI ) relation of galaxies with a sample of more than 500 nearby galaxies covering over five orders of magnitude in Hi mass and more than ten B-band magnitudes. The relation is remarkably tight with a scatter σ ∼0.06 dex, or 14%. The scatter does not change as a function of galaxy luminosity, Hi richness or morphological type. The relation is linked to the fact that dwarf and spiral galaxies have a homogenous radial profile of Hi surface density in the outer regions when the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

43
337
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
43
337
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For each radio source, we determine a matched galaxy if: (a) it has a spectroscopic redshift within the range for H I covered by the ASKAP-12 spectrum, and (b) within an impact parameter of 50 kpc, which is the maximum galactocentric radius typically seen for H I discs (e.g. Wang et al 2016, see also Bland-Hawthorn et al 2017) and within which 21-cm absorption is expected to be detected (e.g. Reeves et al 2016;Curran et al 2016a;Borthakur 2016;Dutta et al 2017).…”
Section: Cross-matching With Optically Identified Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each radio source, we determine a matched galaxy if: (a) it has a spectroscopic redshift within the range for H I covered by the ASKAP-12 spectrum, and (b) within an impact parameter of 50 kpc, which is the maximum galactocentric radius typically seen for H I discs (e.g. Wang et al 2016, see also Bland-Hawthorn et al 2017) and within which 21-cm absorption is expected to be detected (e.g. Reeves et al 2016;Curran et al 2016a;Borthakur 2016;Dutta et al 2017).…”
Section: Cross-matching With Optically Identified Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the absorber detected in GAMA J224500.05-343031.7 does form part of a larger H I disc, then the H I sizemass relation (see e.g. Wang et al 2016 and references therein) would imply a total H I mass of M HI 3 × 10 9 M . Massive and extended H I discs are rare in early type galaxies, but have been seen in the nearby Universe (Serra et al 2012c).…”
Section: Cross-matching With Optically Identified Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way we can estimate the depletion time considering only the gas which is predicted to be contained within the optical disk. We use the Hi size-mass relation from Wang et al (2016) to predict an Hi size using only the Hi mass of each galaxy in our sample. We also adopt a simple exponential profile for the radial Hi mass distribution.…”
Section: Predicting Gas Location From Scaling Relations and Predictinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bosma Fig. 17 Statistics of the ratio of HI diameter, evaluated at Σ HI = 1 M pc −2 , to the optical diameter, following Wang et al (2016), except for the Bluedisk sample, for which Wang et al (2013) Ponomareva et al 2016. Note that several large galaxies are missing from the LVHIS, THINGS, LITTLE THINGS, FIGGS and VIVA samples, while for the WHISP samples a maximum diameter of 400 is imposed, on account of missing flux when comparing the interferometric data with single-dish observations or too large in extent compared to the primary beam.…”
Section: The Relation Between Hi Extent and The Optical Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%