New Knowledge in a New Era of Globalization

Pachura, Piotr

doi:10.5772/982

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…K tomu vede i to, že individuální mezní ochota platit shodně zvyšuje celkové množství přínosu čistého globálního veřejného statku, neboť ji nahrazují individuální mezní ochoty dalších spotřebitelů [Sandler, 2002a;Sonntag, 2014]. Při rozhodování spotřebitele o konkrétní výši mezní ochoty platit to přispívá k volbě strategie "černého pasažéra" [Sandler, 1992;Ersoy, 2011]. Tím spotřebitel sníží celkové množství přínosu čistého globálního veřejného statku.…”

Section: Globální Veřejný Statekunclassified

Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems

Machoň¹

2017

AOP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems The debate surrounding the provision of welfare by state institutions has been widely discussed in the field of political economics since the 1930s. Related research also focuses on welfare supply at an international system level. This article assesses whether international cooperation in the area of sharing remote sensing data leads to the supply of global public goods, which to date has not yet been discussed in related scholarly literature. The supply of global public goods is assessed within the GEO international regime and leads to the use of the non-rivalrous GEOSS, which can be accessed by every socio-economic group in every UN member country including future generations. However, providing the benefit of GEOSS is not always favourable because of the low number of financially participating consumers.

show abstract

Section: Globální Veřejný Statekunclassified

Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems

Machoň¹

2017

AOP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

SDG’s Quality Education Approach: Comparative Analysis of Natural Sciences Curriculum Guidelines between Taiwan and Colombia

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this comparative analysis, the cases of Taiwan and Colombia display two paths for designing a natural sciences curriculum related to quality education goals. Their differences are based on their central concepts, definitions of learning stages, delimitations of cross-subjects and cores of scientific knowledge, and alignment with international assessments. The core practices in Taiwanese curriculum guidelines are to develop inquiries, research, and experimentations to promote scientific literacy and citizenship. In contrast, the core Colombian practices construct explanations based on scientific ideas, gathering information, and using evidence. Between both countries, there is also a concordance over practices related to obtaining and communicating information. These results show the importance of curriculum policy factors such as epistemological definitions, diagnostics and representations of social expectations, alignment instruments, curriculum definitions, and design criteria of teaching processes. The differences between national curriculum policies are identified in a comparative strategy of contexts, medium-term processes to reform the national education systems or schooling features. Curriculum guidelines respond to their intellectual traditions, theoretical and pedagogical influences, and current requirements of policies. These criteria allow for the identification of cooperative issues in specific areas of science education between both countries, such as teacher education, technological and pedagogical knowledge, and curriculum alignment.

show abstract

The history of pathology informatics: A global perspective

Park

Parwani

Aller

et al. 2013

Journal of Pathology Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pathology informatics has evolved to varying levels around the world. The history of pathology informatics in different countries is a tale with many dimensions. At first glance, it is the familiar story of individuals solving problems that arise in their clinical practice to enhance efficiency, better manage (e.g., digitize) laboratory information, as well as exploit emerging information technologies. Under the surface, however, lie powerful resource, regulatory, and societal forces that helped shape our discipline into what it is today. In this monograph, for the first time in the history of our discipline, we collectively perform a global review of the field of pathology informatics. In doing so, we illustrate how general far-reaching trends such as the advent of computers, the Internet and digital imaging have affected pathology informatics in the world at large. Major drivers in the field included the need for pathologists to comply with national standards for health information technology and telepathology applications to meet the scarcity of pathology services and trained people in certain countries. Following trials by a multitude of investigators, not all of them successful, it is apparent that innovation alone did not assure the success of many informatics tools and solutions. Common, ongoing barriers to the widespread adoption of informatics devices include poor information technology infrastructure in undeveloped areas, the cost of technology, and regulatory issues. This review offers a deeper understanding of how pathology informatics historically developed and provides insights into what the promising future might hold.

show abstract

New Knowledge in a New Era of Globalization

Cited by 4 publications

References 73 publications

Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems

Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems

SDG’s Quality Education Approach: Comparative Analysis of Natural Sciences Curriculum Guidelines between Taiwan and Colombia

The history of pathology informatics: A global perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About