The Critic as Amateur 2020
DOI: 10.5040/9781501341441.ch-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Judgments: Literary Criticism on Air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To Bloom, this epigrammatic reference is provocative and indicative of the reflections of Eliot (1922) on the crisis of modern civilization. Bloom (2007) remarks, "…Her condition reflects the condition of the civilization Eliot leads the reader through in The Waste Land, a culture of living death." Analytically, "a culture of living death" could be considered as the crisis suffered the people out of cultural anxiety.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To Bloom, this epigrammatic reference is provocative and indicative of the reflections of Eliot (1922) on the crisis of modern civilization. Bloom (2007) remarks, "…Her condition reflects the condition of the civilization Eliot leads the reader through in The Waste Land, a culture of living death." Analytically, "a culture of living death" could be considered as the crisis suffered the people out of cultural anxiety.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the episode of Marie and her cousin, according Bloom (2007), the poet raises the central question of the poem, "What are the roots that clutch?" (Ferguson et al, 2005;Eliot, 1922) and Bloom (2007) asserts that the provocative question "states directly the problem the poem confronts throughout its five cryptic, fragmented sections." As a complimentary question Eliot raises another question, "what branches grow out of this stony rubbish?"…”
Section: The Burial Of the Deadmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This brings us to an interesting state of affairs regarding all types of metal-containing optics in the visible and near-IR ranges, which can be best described as “metamaterial Catch-22”. , Namely, with the high losses in existing metals, such contrivances as “superlens” and “hyperlens” do not live up to their lofty promises. ,, If, on the other hand, a really low loss metal (or other negative ε medium) is developed, then the aforementioned concepts completely lose their appeal, as more or less conventional optics with artificially high index dielectrics can provide very high resolution and magnified images in the far field and easily outperform both super- and hyperlenses. In other words, with a reduction of metal loss, the concepts of super- and hyperlensing go straight from being unrealizable to being unneeded.…”
Section: What Can Be Done About It?mentioning
confidence: 99%