New investment, old challenges. Land deals and the water constraint in African agriculture

Abstract

Foreign investment in agricultural land acquisition in sub-Saharan Africa has been viewed primarily as driven by a set of linked 'crises': in financial capital markets; in security of energy and food supply; and in global environmental governance. This paper argues that a focus on the 'buyers' of land risks overlooking the dynamics that operate on the side of the land 'sellers'. Accordingly, the first part of the paper argues that it is important to view the current 'land grab' as the latest stage in a longer historical process of competition for control of land and other natural resources by different 'domestic' economic and political actors within African countries. While such struggles are often characterised as the 'state versus the peasantry', with the state acting on behalf of 'urban elites', the paper argues that processes of accumulation and associated enclosure of natural resources need to be examined more critically in specific contexts if the role and impact of foreign capital investment is to be understood. The second part of the paper seeks to identify in what ways questions of scale (in the sense of greater capital intensity) can be considered to be constraints to the development of African agriculture. Particularly, it considers to what extent do the production models most frequently mentioned in connection with foreign investment (large-scale mechanised farms and small-scale outgrower contract farming) respond to current productivity constraints. The paper argues that current debates about foreign investment in agricultural land underplay the importance of water resources needed to overcome production risks associated with irregular rainfall. Bringing the water dimension of land deals more clearly into focus is necessary if the scope for positive and negative impacts of new investment on existing land users is to be fully understood. The paper concludes by considering the implications of such challenges in the current context of foreign investment in agriculture in Africa.

Cultivated Land Use Benefits Under State and Collective Agrarian Property Regimes in China

“…However, we cannot ignore the institutional problems. Unclear land tenure and responsibility, a serious problem, can disturb agricultural management and interfere with cultivated land use and must therefore be inhibited by radical land reform [59,60]. Clarifying the legal status, rights and liability of cultivated land and rural housing is a core RCLRV for townships, villages, and peasants.…”

Differentiated legitimacy, differentiated resilience: beyond the natural in ‘natural disasters’

“…For example, it is widely accepted that there is limited history of 'traditional' irrigation in Malawi, reflecting a tendency to assume that irrigation does not exist simply because it is not formalized or part of schemes. '...its dispersed nature and its integration into rain-fed cultivation, rather than separation in discrete blocks of "irrigated farming", has tended to make it less visible to officials and technical staff trained to differentiate "irrigated" and "rainfed" agriculture as separate production systems' (Woodhouse 2012;784). In fact, in Malawi, as elsewhere in SSA, water management, for example through farming in the dambo wetlands has long been an integral part of livelihood strategies and in recent years there has been an intensification of wetland production that has been critical for food security (Veldwisch et.al 2009).…”

Rethinking Investment Dynamics: An Alternative Framework of the Global Land Rush

“…Many projects are designated for biofuels production, with roughly 40 percent of investors turning to "flex crops" that can be used as either food or fuel (Anseeuw et al, 2012). The term global land grab also obscures the role played by water, as large-scale agriculture often competes with and intensifies existing demand for water, sometimes generating social conflict (Anseeuw et al, 2012;Woodhouse, 2012;Woodhouse & Ganho, 2011).…”