Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98)
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGEPrescribed by ANSI Std. Z39.18
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, The Fluid Intake Monitor (FIM) measures fluid consumed from a bladder hydration system. Bench and field tests were performed to assess reliability and validity of the FIM, Fluid volumes of FIM were compared to scale-weighed volumes of water. Bench Test Results: an absolute percent error existed (p < 0.001) between sips, with the FIM significantly overestimating the first sip (p < 0.01) compared to the subsequent nine sips. A significant intraclass reliability coefficient (ICC) = 0.83 was achieved for trials 2 through 10. There was no difference in mean sip volume measured using the FIM vs. the scale (25.7 + 10.7 ml vs. 25.6 + 8.7 ml, respectively). Field Test Results: of 31 trials, 4 trials under-measured water consumption in excess of 15% (29.4% to 47.1%), and two trials over-measured water consumption in excess of 15% (15.5% and 16.6%). These units were neither reliable nor valid for use in the field. Software and hardware modifications identified should significantly improve FIM performance.