2010
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.m002006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights on the protein-ligand interaction differences between the two primary cellular retinol carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Our results are consistent with conclusions from previous NMR relaxation and NOE measurements on bovine heart FABP and porcine ILBP. 42 Both proteins belong to the iLBP family, but in bovine heart FABP strands 4 and 5 are stabilized by a cross-strand aromatic pair (F64-F70) while in porcine ILBP the pair is absent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…37 Our results are consistent with conclusions from previous NMR relaxation and NOE measurements on bovine heart FABP and porcine ILBP. 42 Both proteins belong to the iLBP family, but in bovine heart FABP strands 4 and 5 are stabilized by a cross-strand aromatic pair (F64-F70) while in porcine ILBP the pair is absent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Phe ladders similar to the one present in CRABP1 22 have been found in several iLBP family members, e.g. intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (IFABP) 36 and cellular retinol-binding proteins (CRBPs) 1 and 2 37 . To assess how conserved this ladder is in other iLBPs we performed a systematic search on the level of primary and tertiary structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Data generated since the first X-ray crystallography and the proteolysis and mutagenesis experiments support the results and deductions of these early studies, concerning differences in structure between apo and holo CRBP1, a conformation change upon ligand binding, the contribution of the helix-turn-helix and other portal residues to the conformation change and/or to ligand binding, and ligand egress relying on “external” partners, rather than by diffusion (Li et al, 1991; Franzoni et al, 2002; Lu et al, 2003; Careri et al, 2006; Mittag et al, 2006; Franzoni et al, 2010; Silvaroli et al, 2016). These studies have refined and added additional detailed insight into the nature of the apo- and holo-CRBP1 structures.…”
Section: Structures Of Retinoid Binding-proteinsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…a) Ribbon diagram of CRBP1 illustrating the entrance portal, key residues, orientation of retinol in the binding pocket, and the structure of the β-clam (Cowan et al, 1993; Franzoni et al, 2002; Lu et al, 2003; Careri et al, 2006; Mittag et al, 2006; Franzoni et al, 2010; 2016 Silvaroli et al, 2016). Red shows the hydroxyl group of retinol.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference was confirmed by limited proteolysis, which demonstrated resistance of holo-CRBP1 to multiple proteases, whereas apo-CRBP1 was digested by the endopeptidase Arg-C at R30 in α-helix II [100, 175]. Since the determination of the structure by X-ray, several NMR studies and a mass spectrometry-based study have confirmed and expanded insight into the flexibility and the ligand entry portal [38, 72, 73, 134, 135, 144, 158]. CRBP1 has a flattened β-barrel (aka β-clam) shape formed by two orthogonal β-sheets (Fig.…”
Section: Current State Of the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%