2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-010-0780-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights on diet variability revealed by DNA barcoding and high‐throughput pyrosequencing: chamois diet in autumn as a case study

Abstract: Characterizing the diet of large herbivores and the determinants of its variation remains a difficult task in wild species. DNA-based techniques have the potential to complement traditional time-consuming methods based on the microhistology of plant cuticle fragments in fecal or rumen samples. Recently, it has been shown that a short chloroplast DNA fragment, the P6 loop of the trnL (UAA) intron, can act as a minimalist barcode. Here, we used the trnL approach with high-throughput pyrosequencing to study diet … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of DNA sequences of different food items and the sequence read counts observed can be subject to a number of methodological and biological bias (Deagle et al, 2013;Thomas et al, 2014). For example, biased amplification can occur when the primers match better sequences in certain species over others (Shehzad et al, 2012b), or because of preferential amplification of shorter sequences (Rayé et al, 2011). Biological factors, such as variation in the proportion of mitochondrial and chloroplast organelles among tissues and differential digestibility of foods, may also influence DNA quantity in the scats and therefore its detectability for diet analysis (Pegard et al, 2009;Deagle et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of DNA sequences of different food items and the sequence read counts observed can be subject to a number of methodological and biological bias (Deagle et al, 2013;Thomas et al, 2014). For example, biased amplification can occur when the primers match better sequences in certain species over others (Shehzad et al, 2012b), or because of preferential amplification of shorter sequences (Rayé et al, 2011). Biological factors, such as variation in the proportion of mitochondrial and chloroplast organelles among tissues and differential digestibility of foods, may also influence DNA quantity in the scats and therefore its detectability for diet analysis (Pegard et al, 2009;Deagle et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered each feces as an approximation of an individual's diet over several days (Castle 1956;Rayé et al 2011), although an individual diet is likely to be more diversified than the diet assessed from one of its feces. However, we assumed here that the possible underestimation of the individual diet's diversity was similar for all herbivore species.…”
Section: Feces Sampling and Diet Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dietary composition of feces was investigated using DNA metabarcoding (Taberlet et al 2007). DNA sequences were obtained and analyzed following Rayé et al (2011). For each feces, the number of sequences was turned into proportions in order to confer the same weight to each feces (Willerslev et al 2014), and plants whose proportion was under 2.5 % were removed.…”
Section: Feces Sampling and Diet Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations