New Insights Into Steam/Solvent-Coinjection-Process Mechanism

Abstract

We present results of a detailed investigation of the steam/ solvent-coinjection-process mechanism by use of a numerical model with homogeneous reservoir properties and various solvents. We describe condensation of steam/solvent mixture near the chamber boundary. We present a composite picture of the important phenomena occurring in the different regions of the reservoir and their implications for oil recovery. We compare performances of various solvents and explain the reasons for the observed differences. An improved understanding of the process mechanism will help with selecting the best solvent and developing the best operating strategy for a given reservoir. Results indicate that as the temperature drops near the chamber boundary, steam starts condensing first because its mole fraction in the injected steam/solvent mixture (and hence its partial pressure and the corresponding saturation temperature) is much higher than the solvent's. As temperature declines toward the chamber boundary and steam continues to condense, the vapor phase becomes increasingly richer in solvent. At the chamber boundary where the temperature becomes equal to the condensation temperature of both steam and solvent at their respective partial pressures, both condense simultaneously. Thus, contrary to steam-only injection, where condensation occurs at the injected steam temperature, condensation of steam/solvent mixture is accompanied by a reduction in temperature in the condensation zone and the farther regions. However, there is little change in temperature in the central region of the steam chamber. The condensed steam/solvent mixture drains outside the chamber, leading to the formation of a mobile liquid stream (drainage region) where heated oil, condensed solvent, and water flow together to the production well. The condensed solvent mixes with the heated oil and further reduces its viscosity. The additional reduction in viscosity by solvent more than offsets the effect of reduced temperature near the chamber boundary. As the steam chamber expands laterally because of continued injection and as temperature in the hitherto drainage region increases, a part of the condensed solvent mixed with oil evaporates. This lowers the residual oil saturation (ROS) in the steam chamber. Therefore, ultimate oil recovery with the steam/solvent-coinjection process is higher than that in steam-only injection. The higher the solvent concentration in oil at a location, the greater is the reduction in the ROS there. Our explanation is corroborated by the experimental results reported in the literature, which show smaller ROS in the steam chamber after a steam/solvent-coinjection process. A lighter solvent has a lower viscosity, a higher volatility, and a higher molar concentration of solvent in the drainage region. Thus, a lighter solvent causes a greater reduction in the viscosity of the heated oil and also leads to a lower ROS. Therefore, the lightest condensable solvent (butane, under the conditions investigated) provides the most favorable results i...

Analysis of steam–solvent–bitumen phase behavior and solvent mass transfer for improving the performance of the ES-SAGD process

“…Fig. 2b shows the schematic of four zones (A, B, C, and D) along the study location from the left end to its right end (from inner region of the steam chamber to the original cold oil sand), which are summarized in Table 2 (Mohammadzadeh et al, 2010;Jha et al, 2013). To be more specific, the middle location of the cross section depicted in Fig.…”

“…Previous studies show that hydrocarbon additives with similar saturation properties as steam should be chosen. At the boundary of the steam chamber, solvent condenses with steam simultaneously (Li and Mamora, 2011;Jha et al, 2013). However, Dong investigated the phase behavior of the steamsolvent system and proposed an algorithm to estimate the equilibrium temperature and solvent fraction in the vapor phase at the boundary of the steam chamber (Dong, 2012).…”

A semi-analytical solution to optimize single-component solvent coinjection with steam during SAGD

“…It is common practice to use a single component to represent bitumen in research on SAGD and coinjection processes [14,22,24,32,33]. Reliable characterization of bitumen/solvent/ water interactions for coinjection processes has not been established in the literature.…”

Modeling Displacement Efficiency Improvement During Solvent Aided-SAGD

“…A number of numerical, analytical and laboratory studies have investigated the effects of solvent type, solvent-steam coinjection ratio and coinjection strategy on the oil production rate (Nasr et al 2003;Gupta and Gitting 2007b;Gupta and Gittins 2012;Jha et al 2013;Keshavarz et al 2014 bc;Li et al 2011b;Shu and Hartman 1988;Yazdani el al. 2011;Rabiei et al 2014).…”

“…As mentioned by Jha et al (2013), there were attempts in the literature to model the lower residual oil saturation inside a coinjection chamber by modifying the saturation end points of the relative permeability curves. These included using small residual oil saturations to gas (Gates 2007;Ardali et al 2011) or using composition dependent residual saturations (Ivory et al 2010).…”