2015
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Insights into Single-Molecule Junctions Using a Robust, Unsupervised Approach to Data Collection and Analysis

Abstract: We have applied a new, robust and unsupervised approach to data collection, sorting and analysis that provides fresh insights into the nature of single-molecule junctions. Automation of tunneling current-distance (I(s)) spectroscopy facilitates the collection of very large data sets (up to 100,000 traces for a single experiment), enabling comprehensive statistical interrogations with respect to underlying tunneling characteristics, noise and junction formation probability (JFP). We frequently observe unusual l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
62
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21,23 More recently (and subsequent to the period during which the data of this paper were collected), a novel experimental approach to fully automated data collection and algorithmbased analysis using the I(s) technique has been developed, and the archetypal 1,8-octanedithiol was chosen as the first exemplar of this new method. 8 A junction conductance of 5 × 10 −5 G 0 was observed, very similar to the "medium" ("B" group) conductance previously determined, but the other conductance values were not distinct in their processed data. This is consistent with the observation of Haiss et al that this conductance group is normally the most prevalent.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21,23 More recently (and subsequent to the period during which the data of this paper were collected), a novel experimental approach to fully automated data collection and algorithmbased analysis using the I(s) technique has been developed, and the archetypal 1,8-octanedithiol was chosen as the first exemplar of this new method. 8 A junction conductance of 5 × 10 −5 G 0 was observed, very similar to the "medium" ("B" group) conductance previously determined, but the other conductance values were not distinct in their processed data. This is consistent with the observation of Haiss et al that this conductance group is normally the most prevalent.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…All data shown in the paper were collected using the STM-BJ technique, and no selection was applied to the datasets: we collected thousands of currentdistance traces as junctions were made and broken, and these were compiled in histograms with no further manipulation. As the hit rate (percentage of traces showing molecular bridging) lies between 10% and 30% for such experiments, 8 histograms were compiled including a large number of spurious traces, and this resulted in broad conductance peaks, spanning more than one order of magnitude. We reasoned that a process of rational data selection, removing all the traces that either bear no sign of junction formation or show evident instrumental noise or anomalous current decay, may reveal a finer histogram peak structure, giving more information about J. Chem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preanalysis methods are often employed to filter the data, with varying degrees of objectivity. Recently, new methods [1][2][3] have analyzed large SMBJ data sets without making a priori assumptions about molecular plateau shape, and without resorting to hand sorting and subjective filtering choices.…”
Section: Use Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments are not simple; it is necessary to analyse many I(z) curves and perform careful statistical analysis on them. Early experiments tended to select curves 'by eye', but more robust data selection techniques [15] are undoubtedly the way forward. There are also several variations of these STM type measurements in which the pulling rate between tip and sample is varied or the bias is changed during the I(z) trace [16].…”
Section: Experimental Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%