2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Insights into Controlling Factors of Pore Evolution in Organic-rich Shale

Abstract: Pore evolution in organic-rich shale is synchronically controlled by organic and inorganic diagenesis processes that are significantly different from sandstones and carbonates. Fundamental studies were conducted in characterizing pore evolution. However, pore evolution mechanisms and the main controlling factors for the particular pore size range have not been clarified yet. Herein, we conducted thermal simulation experiment, coupled with petrological, mineralogical, and organic geochemical tests on the organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guo, Jia, et al, 2017;Q. Guo, Wu, & Ren, 2017;Xu et al, 2021), they agreed that the thermal evolution of OM played an important role in the evolution of pores in shale (Chen & Xiao, 2014;Yu et al, 2020). Pore evolution had a great influence on the physical properties of shale reservoirs (H. Guo, Jia, et al, 2017;Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guo, Jia, et al, 2017;Q. Guo, Wu, & Ren, 2017;Xu et al, 2021), they agreed that the thermal evolution of OM played an important role in the evolution of pores in shale (Chen & Xiao, 2014;Yu et al, 2020). Pore evolution had a great influence on the physical properties of shale reservoirs (H. Guo, Jia, et al, 2017;Q.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the generation and migration of pyrolysis products caused the connectivity and porosity of pores increasing (Q. Wang et al, 2010). Although scholars have not reached a consensus on the regularity of pore evolution (Curtis et al, 2012; H. Guo, Jia, et al, 2017; Q. Guo, Wu, & Ren, 2017; Xu et al, 2021), they agreed that the thermal evolution of OM played an important role in the evolution of pores in shale (Chen & Xiao, 2014; L. Sun et al, 2015; Yu et al, 2020). Pore evolution had a great influence on the physical properties of shale reservoirs (H. Guo, Jia, et al, 2017; Q. Guo, Wu, & Ren, 2017; Ko et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…182−184 Dissolution in shale gas reservoirs mainly occurs in carbonate minerals or potassium feldspar, but the organic acid formed by organic matter hydrocarbon generation also has a certain dissolution effect on clay minerals. 5,185,186 Metasomatism refers to the dissolution of original minerals and the formation of new minerals, which is generally considered to have little impact on the pore structure of clay minerals. As mentioned above, the role of clay content in CH 4 adsorption capacity decreases during shale diagenesis.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cementation, dissolution, metasomatism, and recrystallization play a role in pore structure transformation. Recrystallization includes the transformation of amorphous siliceous minerals to authigenic quartz and the secondary enlargement of clastic quartz crystals, both of them will reduce the pore space of inorganic minerals. ,, Dissolution is constructive to the formation of pore space, including the dissolution pores in clay minerals and the dissolution of carbonate and siliceous cements in clay mineral pores. Dissolution in shale gas reservoirs mainly occurs in carbonate minerals or potassium feldspar, but the organic acid formed by organic matter hydrocarbon generation also has a certain dissolution effect on clay minerals. ,, Metasomatism refers to the dissolution of original minerals and the formation of new minerals, which is generally considered to have little impact on the pore structure of clay minerals.…”
Section: Diagenetic Evolution and Its Influence On Clay Adsorption Ca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this wettability evaluation is debatable and under certain circumstances even erroneous in the application of shale . Shale bears a large lithological heterogeneity under the joint impacts of clay minerals and OM components, leading to a large variation in wettability or wetting behavior performance. OM pores typically present a hydrophobic performance. ,, Kaolinitic mudrocks show a hydrophobic preference, whereas shales rich in illite and smectite present a more hydrophilic preference .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%