2018
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights from continuous glucose monitoring into the route to diabetes

Abstract: Continuous glucose monitoring system allows for a better T2DM risk-development categorization than fasting glucose and HbA in a high-risk population. Continuous glucose monitoring system-derived phenotyping reveals clinical differences, not disclosed by conventional fasting plasma glucose/HbA categorization. These differences may correlate with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CGM systems have experienced great surge over the last years, mainly for treatment monitoring, though its use has also been proposed for early diagnosis and phenotyping . In our work, we explore the role of CGM at baseline for the selection of candidates for duodenal exclusion procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CGM systems have experienced great surge over the last years, mainly for treatment monitoring, though its use has also been proposed for early diagnosis and phenotyping . In our work, we explore the role of CGM at baseline for the selection of candidates for duodenal exclusion procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different prediabetic phenotypes have been described (impaired fasting glucose, IFG and impaired glucose tolerance, IGT), depending on the relative contribution of ß‐cell dysfunction and site of insulin resistance . These differential features might persist once T2DM is established and depict the two possible routes from health to diabetes. In the present article, we refer to loss of tonic or phasic control depending on the predominance of IFG phenotype or IGT phenotype, respectively. Loss of “tonic control” of glycaemia, displayed as an IFG phenotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) phenotype is defined as a categorical variable (fasting glycaemia > 100mg/dl). However, transforming it into a quantitative variable may drastically change its sensitivity [32], so the percentage of time with glycaemia lower than 100 mg/dL has been measured as an indicator of fine fasting glucose control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, SMBG cannot capture fluctuations in blood glucose throughout the day and night because of practical limitations on the number and timing of finger sticks. Instead, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology demonstrates clinical details that cannot be disclosed by conventional fasting plasma glucose and HbA 1c and has been widely applied in clinical practice. More importantly, innovative technologies related to CGM, such as wearables, implants, mobile applications, and cloud technology with professional medical intervention, are emerging, which is promising in changing diabetic patients' lives dramatically …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%