2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jb017665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Insight Into a Volcanic System: Analogue Investigation of Bubble‐Driven Deformation in an Elastic Conduit

Abstract: Analogue and numerical simulations have been widely used to describe the mechanisms of bubble and slug ascent during volcanic eruptions as well as their formation and explosion mechanisms. Nevertheless, little is known about the mechanical interaction between the fluid and the surrounding medium. In this work, we report the results from analogue experiments designed to show how deformation of the conduit walls induced by the rising slugs is related to the radiation and propagation of seismic and geodetic signa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While most experimenters indicate the size of the tank they are using, the size of the load applied during the Young's modulus measurement is never provided except by Kavanagh et al [16]. In the literature, the minimum size of the tank ranges from 8.6 cm [16] to 80 cm [6], which means that the maximum size of the applied load should be less than 0.4 cm for the smallest tanks and less than 3.8 cm for the largest. We provide a solution to this problem as from our results, it is possible to derive a correction factor to be applied to the value derived using the analytical formula in order to take into account the actual size of the tank (Fig.…”
Section: Validity Domain Of the Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most experimenters indicate the size of the tank they are using, the size of the load applied during the Young's modulus measurement is never provided except by Kavanagh et al [16]. In the literature, the minimum size of the tank ranges from 8.6 cm [16] to 80 cm [6], which means that the maximum size of the applied load should be less than 0.4 cm for the smallest tanks and less than 3.8 cm for the largest. We provide a solution to this problem as from our results, it is possible to derive a correction factor to be applied to the value derived using the analytical formula in order to take into account the actual size of the tank (Fig.…”
Section: Validity Domain Of the Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%