2015
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1070804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New influence diagnostics in ridge regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32,33 This issue has been well studied for the LMs. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Controlling the multicollinearity may increase the effect of influence cases. 33,38,39 Belsley et al 33 pointed out that the performance of influence diagnostics maybe change using the ridge estimation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 This issue has been well studied for the LMs. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Controlling the multicollinearity may increase the effect of influence cases. 33,38,39 Belsley et al 33 pointed out that the performance of influence diagnostics maybe change using the ridge estimation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the conventional influence measures in the RR and LE of ordinary linear regression has seen a great surge of research activities during the last two decades or so. It is clear from several articles that appeared in the lit-erature; see, e.g., Walker and Brich (1988), Asar and Erisoglu (2016) and Emami and Emami (2015). However, the LE is generalized to fit the semiparametric regression model for multicollinearity data (see Akdeniz and Akdeniz Duran (2010), Duran et al ( 2012) and Duran et al (2011)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%