2019
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New image analysis tool for facial pore characterization and assessment

Abstract: Background Visible facial pores are an important cosmetic concern especially among young females. Number of different methodologies is used today to assess facial pores and efficacy of technologies. Main limitations of these methods are, however, (a) moderate correlation with visual perception, (b) characterization is mostly limited to size or number of pores, (c) measurement is limited to a smaller area of face, and (d) operational difficulties. In order to address these limitations, we developed a 2D image a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to variances observed between qualitative and quantitative VISIA CR assessment of wrinkles a recent study demonstrates high correlation between visual grading and pore size as assessed by VISIA CR. 19 While qualitative measures of pores were not incorporated into this study the quantitative reduction of enlarged pores by −28.3% herein is of greater magnitude than that reported with several other energy-based treatments: for example, 17% improvement in pore score (percentage of skin surface with detectable pores per VISIA CR) with a series of six 1440-nm laser treatments 20 ; eg, 4% reduction in average number of facial pores 2 months after a series of five broadband light treatments per VISIA CR. 21 Limitations of this subanalysis include the relatively short 3month post-treatment endpoint, the inclusion of a limited number of subjects with substantial variation in results and therefore large standard deviations and the absence of a control group as is often the case in this kind of study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to variances observed between qualitative and quantitative VISIA CR assessment of wrinkles a recent study demonstrates high correlation between visual grading and pore size as assessed by VISIA CR. 19 While qualitative measures of pores were not incorporated into this study the quantitative reduction of enlarged pores by −28.3% herein is of greater magnitude than that reported with several other energy-based treatments: for example, 17% improvement in pore score (percentage of skin surface with detectable pores per VISIA CR) with a series of six 1440-nm laser treatments 20 ; eg, 4% reduction in average number of facial pores 2 months after a series of five broadband light treatments per VISIA CR. 21 Limitations of this subanalysis include the relatively short 3month post-treatment endpoint, the inclusion of a limited number of subjects with substantial variation in results and therefore large standard deviations and the absence of a control group as is often the case in this kind of study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VISIA Skin Analysis System has been widely used in many dermatological and aesthetic settings. The system is used for the assessment of pores, pigmentation, redness, texture, and wrinkles [21–23]. Recent studies have been used to help assess outcomes of treatments for photo‐aging skin, erythema from acne and changes in periocular wrinkles post non‐ablative fractional laser treatment [24–26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, pores were detected in an image analysis algorithm to detect circular pore-like shapes via edge-enhanced binary images at the cheek region. The total area of detected pores was then calculated ( Figure 2 A,B) [ 8 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%