DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74260-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Hypothesis Distinctiveness Measure for Better Ellipse Extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, most hybrid methods include some or other form of grouping mechanism to group the edges that possibly belong to the same ellipse (Chia et al, 2011;Hahn et al, 2008;Kawaguchi and Nagata, 1998b;Kim et al, 2002;Mai et al, 2008). Finally, there are some essential ellipse refinement and selection steps to deal with the outliers and reduce false positives (Basca et al, 2005;Cheng, 2006;Ji and Haralick, 2001;Princen et al, 1994;Qiao and Ong, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Prasad et al, 2010e)). …”
Section: Contemporary Ellipse Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, most hybrid methods include some or other form of grouping mechanism to group the edges that possibly belong to the same ellipse (Chia et al, 2011;Hahn et al, 2008;Kawaguchi and Nagata, 1998b;Kim et al, 2002;Mai et al, 2008). Finally, there are some essential ellipse refinement and selection steps to deal with the outliers and reduce false positives (Basca et al, 2005;Cheng, 2006;Ji and Haralick, 2001;Princen et al, 1994;Qiao and Ong, 2007;Wang et al, 2007;Prasad et al, 2010e)). …”
Section: Contemporary Ellipse Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%