2015
DOI: 10.4155/fso.15.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New hits as phase II enzymes inducers from a focused library with heteroatom–heteroatom and Michael-acceptor motives

Abstract: The increased activity of phase-II-detoxification enzymes, such as quinone reductase (QR) and glutation S-transferase (GST), correlates with protection against chemically induced carcinogenesis. Herein we studied 11 different chemotypes, pyrazole, 1,2,4-oxadiazole, 1,2,5-oxadiazole, 1,2,3-thiadiazole, 1,2,4-thiazole, 1,3,4-oxathiazole, thienyl hydrazone, α,β-unsaturated-oxime, α,β-unsaturated-N-oxide, coumarin and α,β-unsaturated-carbonyl, as phase-II enzymes inducers in order to identify new pharmacophores wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CIs for all of the studied compounds (Table 3) were higher than 1.0, showing low cytotoxicities at the CDs. 23,24 This assay confirmed that both chalcone-like compounds 8 and 22, unlike derivative 9, are monofunctional inducers due to fact that they displayed the same values of CDs in both cell lines, 11.0 μM in Hepa-1c1c7 and 10.0 μM in BpRc1 for the first derivative and 14.0 μM in Hepa-1c1c7 and 10.0 μM in BpRc1 for the second one (Table 3). In contrast, the controls 2 and t-BHQ had bifunctional behaviors in our assay, needing a hundred-and six-times, respectively, lower doses to induce doubling of the QR activity in the wild-type cells (R B/H , Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CIs for all of the studied compounds (Table 3) were higher than 1.0, showing low cytotoxicities at the CDs. 23,24 This assay confirmed that both chalcone-like compounds 8 and 22, unlike derivative 9, are monofunctional inducers due to fact that they displayed the same values of CDs in both cell lines, 11.0 μM in Hepa-1c1c7 and 10.0 μM in BpRc1 for the first derivative and 14.0 μM in Hepa-1c1c7 and 10.0 μM in BpRc1 for the second one (Table 3). In contrast, the controls 2 and t-BHQ had bifunctional behaviors in our assay, needing a hundred-and six-times, respectively, lower doses to induce doubling of the QR activity in the wild-type cells (R B/H , Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…22 The increment of the enzymatic activity in the mutant cell line concomitant with the increment in the wild-type indicates that the compound tested is a monofunctional inducer (induces only phase II enzymes) however when the increment is only in the wild-type, the compound is considered to be a bifunctional inducer since there is evidence that the pathway that is actually operating is the xenobiotic (aryl hydrocarbon) responsive element receptor (Ahr-XRE), which induces both phase I and phase II enzymes. 21,[23][24][25] In this first approach we determined QR phase-II enzyme induction at 10.0 μM using the ratio of specific activity between the wild and mutant cells, r H/B , as an inducer descriptor where a value near to 1 with the concomitant increment of specific activity in both studied cell lines indicates monofunctional behav-iour. Meanwhile, a value higher than 1 with the concomitant increment of specific activity in both studied cell lines indicates bifunctional behavior (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations