2018
DOI: 10.1111/ter.12368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New high‐resolution age data from the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary indicate rapid, ecologically driven onset of the Cambrian explosion

Abstract: The replacement of the late Precambrian Ediacaran biota by morphologically disparate animals at the beginning of the Phanerozoic was a key event in the history of life on Earth, the mechanisms and the time-scales of which are not entirely understood. A composite section in Namibia providing biostratigraphic and chemostratigraphic data bracketed by radiometric dating constrains the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary to 538.6-538.8 Ma, more than 2 Ma younger than previously assumed. The U-Pb-CA-ID TIMS zircon ages demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…550 Ma. In addition, the presence of Cloudina index fossil in the Tagatiya Guazu Formation reinforces this age and confirms a depositional age between 550 and ~539 Ma (Linnemann et al, 2019) for the oldest carbonate rocks of the Itapucumi Group. However, fossils are apparently absent from the overlying Camba Jhopo and entire Cerro Curuzu formations, so the depositional age of the uppermost Itapucumi Group is constrained only by chemostratigraphic data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…550 Ma. In addition, the presence of Cloudina index fossil in the Tagatiya Guazu Formation reinforces this age and confirms a depositional age between 550 and ~539 Ma (Linnemann et al, 2019) for the oldest carbonate rocks of the Itapucumi Group. However, fossils are apparently absent from the overlying Camba Jhopo and entire Cerro Curuzu formations, so the depositional age of the uppermost Itapucumi Group is constrained only by chemostratigraphic data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We have not followed the current ICS timescale as this lacks definitive lower Cambrian subdivisions and all numerical ages, including the base of the Cambrian, are provisional. On the Siberian Platform, the first Treptichnus pedum appearance predates 541 Ma 15 , and recent dating of ash beds in the Nama Group, Namibia, indicates that the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary could be younger than as 538 Ma 16 . Dating of Tommotian strata on the Siberian Platform that contains a Tommotian archaeocyath assemblages yields a 534.6 Ma age 17 rather than the 529 Ma age based on the ICS timescale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1C, DR1), which is also located in southern Shaanxi Province and about 20 km from the Lijiagou section, a population of the youngest detrital zircons from the Gaojiashan Member of the middle Dengying Formation gives a U-Pb age of 548±8 Ma (Cui et al, 2016). These ages suggest that the Beiwan Member was deposited near the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary (ECB), particularly considering that the ECB is recently constrained to be ~539 Ma (Linnemann et al, 2019).…”
Section: Age Constraints the Dengying Formation In South China Is Wimentioning
confidence: 99%