2013
DOI: 10.1134/s1810232813030065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New group contribution method for the prediction of normal melting points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Gong et al reported that at 773 K, there are no sugars or anhydrosugars detected during the reaction, because almost all of the cellulose have already decomposed at such high temperature. For the normal melting point, estimation using both Joback and Perez-Ponce methods gave quite a similar value. Oja and Suuberg recorded a melting point of 453 K for levoglucosan and 513 K for cellobiose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Gong et al reported that at 773 K, there are no sugars or anhydrosugars detected during the reaction, because almost all of the cellulose have already decomposed at such high temperature. For the normal melting point, estimation using both Joback and Perez-Ponce methods gave quite a similar value. Oja and Suuberg recorded a melting point of 453 K for levoglucosan and 513 K for cellobiose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The parameters evaluated in this study are the critical properties, ideal gas properties, and condensed gas properties. The critical properties such as critical temperature (T c ), critical volume (V c ), and critical pressure (P c ) were estimated employing the methods of Joback 30 and Lydersen et al; 55 the enthalpy of vaporization via the methods of Joback, 30 Riedel, 57 and QPPR methods; the enthalpy of fusion by the Joback 30 method; the normal boiling point by Joback 30 and Stein and Brown 31 methods; and the normal melting point by Joback and Reid 60 and Peŕez Ponce et al 58 methods. The thermodynamic properties estimated using DFT were heat 1 shows the most thermodynamically stable molecular structures identified as the likely constituents of the dehydrated anhydrooligo-sugars.…”
Section: Validation Of Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is similar to what Fonts et al 19 obtained for larger compounds. For normal melting point, both methods (Joback and Reid 31 and Peŕez-Ponce et al 36 ) applied seem to agree with each other giving quite closer values. The estimated values for the dimer fragments in this work are close to the melting point of cellobiose (513 K) reported in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…A considerable disadvantage of Hezave's neural network model is the use of melting point temperature of ILs. Note that, for organic compounds, P erez Ponce et al [31] showed an AARD higher than 7.5% for several methods reported during years 1987e2006; additionally, they presented an AARD for three commercial softwares for predicting T m with an AARD higher than 12% and maximum deviations higher than 45%. For ILs, Huo et al [32] presented a group contribution method (GCM) for estimating the melting point of imidazolium-ILs with an AARD of 5.9% and maximum deviations higher than 32%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%