1974
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(74)90039-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New giant resonances in nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas their observation in 3~'Ar, 39K, 39Ca ..., which are detected after cooling down cannot decide between the two possibilities, their clear observation in the inelasticaly scattered 4~ does show that excitations in only one fragment are possible. According to the pure harmonic oscillator model a high multipolarity transition such as E8 for example, could occur at excitation energies comparable to the observed ones [14]. For high multipole giant resonances (L>4) very few theoretical predictions from more refined models have been reported [15].…”
Section: B Giant Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas their observation in 3~'Ar, 39K, 39Ca ..., which are detected after cooling down cannot decide between the two possibilities, their clear observation in the inelasticaly scattered 4~ does show that excitations in only one fragment are possible. According to the pure harmonic oscillator model a high multipolarity transition such as E8 for example, could occur at excitation energies comparable to the observed ones [14]. For high multipole giant resonances (L>4) very few theoretical predictions from more refined models have been reported [15].…”
Section: B Giant Resonancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Electron scattering and initial proton scattering results could not distinguish between excitation of an £2 giant quadrupole resonance and an EQ giant monopole resonance. 1 Later proton cross-section measurements 2,3 showed a preference for the E2 interpretation. 4 The angular distributions for 71-MeV 3 He ions could not distinguish between E2 and E0 excitations, but the E2 interpretation was preferred from the predicted EWSR strengths.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 The primary purpose of previous measurements has been to characterize the pronounced resonance structure at E x ~63A~1 /3 MeV, which is 2-3 MeV below the well-known El giant dipole resonance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus it should not correspond to the observed GQR and no other 2+ states with large E2-transition are obtained at higher energies by the 160_a model. On the other hand, as shown in Table I, the (l60-a ) + (l60* -a) cluster model contains some parts of the 5P(6, R) state~ with 2hw excitation, for example, (10,0), (8,1) and (6,2) states labeled in 5U (3). Furthermore, it is noticed that two states with the (10,0) symmetry are included in the (l60-a ) + (l60*-a) model.…”
Section: K=[ko R Oyik(r)2]mentioning
confidence: 99%