1993
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1993)119:2(196)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Generation of Planning Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…So the crew allotted for that particular activity is forced to wait till the space vacated by the crew allocated for the preceding activities [8]. This idle time turns to the excess of project cost.…”
Section: Work Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the crew allotted for that particular activity is forced to wait till the space vacated by the crew allocated for the preceding activities [8]. This idle time turns to the excess of project cost.…”
Section: Work Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explicit representation of activity relationships is one of its main advantages. However CPM does not deal effectively with repetitive cycles, randomness and probabilistic estimates, and network branch decision-making [8,11].…”
Section: Past Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bar Chart and Critical Path Method (CPM) scheduling receive criticism in the literature for their inability to maintain work continuity in repetitive projects [4][5][6][7]. Furthermore, such scheduling techniques assume the resources as unlimitedly available in the initial development of a schedule and for this reason, requirement to revision occurs later to adjust the schedule to resource limitations [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%