2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra08522f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New functionalized MIL-53(In) solids: syntheses, characterization, sorption, and structural flexibility

Abstract: Syntheses, characterization, sorption, and structural flexibility of new functionalized MIL-53(In) solids were fully investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MIL-53-In was synthesized according to the literature method. 32 In(NO 3 ) 3 xH 2 O (0.194 g, 0.50 mmol) and DHBDC (0.148 g, 0.75 mmol) were ultrasonically separated into a Teflon kettle containing DMF (4.00 mL), H 2 O (1.00 mL), HF (40%, 0.03 mL) and HClO 4 (70%, 0.22 mL). Then the solution was heated at 80 °C for 16 hours (yield: 43%, based on In).…”
Section: Synthesis Of Mil-53-al/ga/in-dhbdcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIL-53-In was synthesized according to the literature method. 32 In(NO 3 ) 3 xH 2 O (0.194 g, 0.50 mmol) and DHBDC (0.148 g, 0.75 mmol) were ultrasonically separated into a Teflon kettle containing DMF (4.00 mL), H 2 O (1.00 mL), HF (40%, 0.03 mL) and HClO 4 (70%, 0.22 mL). Then the solution was heated at 80 °C for 16 hours (yield: 43%, based on In).…”
Section: Synthesis Of Mil-53-al/ga/in-dhbdcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the magnitude of electronegativity and the size of the M ions makes it possible to search for new compounds with a specific composition and structure or to explain the unreality of their preparation, including the conversion of MIL-53(M 3+ ) into another type of MOF or the production of non-single-phase samples subject to the synthesis conditions (Table 1). Thus, phases with M 3+ = V (r V VI = 0.64Å, χ V = 1.53) [13], Sc (r Sc VI = 0.745Å, χ Sc = 1.19) [14], and In (r In VI = 0.8Å, χ In = 1.66) [15], and are obtained by the hydrothermal method under different conditions (temperature, duration of the process) and synthesis than those presented in Table 1 which crystallize in other types of structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A higher lability usually allows the synthesis of larger single crystals . Therefore, the crystal structures of Ga- and In-MOFs are often elucidated by SCXRD, while the structures of Al-MOFs are most often determined from PXRD data. , Structure determination from SCXRD data is preferable, as it is more straightforward and since a higher accuracy is achieved due to the lack of overlapping reflections …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Therefore, the crystal structures of Ga-and In-MOFs are often elucidated by SCXRD, while the structures of Al-MOFs are most often determined from PXRD data. 27,28 Structure determination from SCXRD data is preferable, as it is more straightforward and since a higher accuracy is achieved due to the lack of overlapping reflections. 29 In recent years we have intensely studied the influence of the linker size and geometry on the crystal structure of Al-MOFs.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%