Abstract:Purpose
Diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) often presents a challenge in female patients. Traditional diagnostic elements such as symptom history and urodynamic data are rarely clear cut in women. Therefore, we sought to review the current literature on diagnosis of female BOO, focusing on new frontiers in the realm of molecular markers and imaging modalities.
Recent Findings
In addition to fluoroscopy in the setting of videourodynamics, ultrasound and MRI can augment the diagnosis and aid in ther… Show more
“…In the setting of BOO, a pathologic increase in outlet resistance is recorded, conducting to a more forceful contraction of the detrusor muscle to generate urine flow across the outlet. This dysfunction results in functional and anatomical changes in the detrusor as well as in the neural networks involved in the process (1). Whereas BOO in males is mainly due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the causes are more varied in females, being subdivided into anatomic and functional.…”
Section: Physiology Of Voiding and Boomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among anatomic causes, urethral distortion secondary to pelvic organ prolapse (POP), iatrogenic BOO caused by antiincontinence procedures, intrinsic etiologies (strictures, fibrosis, urethral diverticula), should be considered. Functional BOO results from primary bladder neck obstruction (failure of bladder neck relaxation), neurogenic detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia, non-neurogenic dysfunctional voiding (abnormal contraction of periurethral muscle) and Fowler's syndrome (1,5).…”
Section: Physiology Of Voiding and Boomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased concentration of NGF can reduce the threshold or increase excitability in the afferent fibers leading to increased bladder sensation or overactivity. Expression of NGF is modulated by intervention, being reduced after medical or surgical treatment of the obstruction (1,5).…”
Section: Basic Knowledge On Ngf Production and Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the decreases in NGF/Cr levels after treatment correlated with subjective improvement in the symptoms of patients as demonstrated by decreased UDI-6 survey scores and objective improvement as demonstrated by increased flow rates. Therefore, urinary NGF looks like a promising tool for women with suspected anatomic BOO as a diagnostic and an objective assessment of the therapeutic effects of surgical and medical interventions in women with BOO (1,5).…”
Section: Relationship Between Ngf and Boo In Female Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in females is often challenging, not only because of the overlap in storage and voiding symptoms in women with various etiologies of lower urinary tract dysfunction but also due to the lack of standardized urodynamic criteria to define the condition (1).…”
Objective: Diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in females is often challenging, not only because of the overlap in storage and voiding symptoms in women with various etiologies of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction but also due to the lack of standardized urodynamic criteria to define the condition. There is an unmet need of biologic markers to evaluate BOO in females as an adjunct to other clinical criteria. We sought to elucidate the role of urinary biomarkers in female BOO. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review of studies involving urinary biomarkers in female BOO. The search was performed in PubMed. A total of 58 papers were retrieved and 2 were included for final analysis.Results: Currently, there are no validated biologic markers for female BOO available. Having a biomarker that can be obtained through a urine sample will be an invaluable tool to evaluate and counsel patients with LUT symptoms and possible BOO. The use of NGF as an indicator of BOO in female patients seems to be promising: NGF levels are elevated in women with BOO when compared with normal controls. Conclusions: We found that NGF levels may be applied as a useful biomarker in the diagnosis and evaluation of female patients with BOO symptoms. It will not completely replace other clinical diagnostic tools such as formal urodynamic testing but play a role as a supplement to it. Nevertheless, further studies should be conducted to establish NGF levels as a female BOO biomarker and a routine testing modality.
“…In the setting of BOO, a pathologic increase in outlet resistance is recorded, conducting to a more forceful contraction of the detrusor muscle to generate urine flow across the outlet. This dysfunction results in functional and anatomical changes in the detrusor as well as in the neural networks involved in the process (1). Whereas BOO in males is mainly due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the causes are more varied in females, being subdivided into anatomic and functional.…”
Section: Physiology Of Voiding and Boomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among anatomic causes, urethral distortion secondary to pelvic organ prolapse (POP), iatrogenic BOO caused by antiincontinence procedures, intrinsic etiologies (strictures, fibrosis, urethral diverticula), should be considered. Functional BOO results from primary bladder neck obstruction (failure of bladder neck relaxation), neurogenic detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia, non-neurogenic dysfunctional voiding (abnormal contraction of periurethral muscle) and Fowler's syndrome (1,5).…”
Section: Physiology Of Voiding and Boomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased concentration of NGF can reduce the threshold or increase excitability in the afferent fibers leading to increased bladder sensation or overactivity. Expression of NGF is modulated by intervention, being reduced after medical or surgical treatment of the obstruction (1,5).…”
Section: Basic Knowledge On Ngf Production and Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the decreases in NGF/Cr levels after treatment correlated with subjective improvement in the symptoms of patients as demonstrated by decreased UDI-6 survey scores and objective improvement as demonstrated by increased flow rates. Therefore, urinary NGF looks like a promising tool for women with suspected anatomic BOO as a diagnostic and an objective assessment of the therapeutic effects of surgical and medical interventions in women with BOO (1,5).…”
Section: Relationship Between Ngf and Boo In Female Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in females is often challenging, not only because of the overlap in storage and voiding symptoms in women with various etiologies of lower urinary tract dysfunction but also due to the lack of standardized urodynamic criteria to define the condition (1).…”
Objective: Diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in females is often challenging, not only because of the overlap in storage and voiding symptoms in women with various etiologies of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction but also due to the lack of standardized urodynamic criteria to define the condition. There is an unmet need of biologic markers to evaluate BOO in females as an adjunct to other clinical criteria. We sought to elucidate the role of urinary biomarkers in female BOO. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review of studies involving urinary biomarkers in female BOO. The search was performed in PubMed. A total of 58 papers were retrieved and 2 were included for final analysis.Results: Currently, there are no validated biologic markers for female BOO available. Having a biomarker that can be obtained through a urine sample will be an invaluable tool to evaluate and counsel patients with LUT symptoms and possible BOO. The use of NGF as an indicator of BOO in female patients seems to be promising: NGF levels are elevated in women with BOO when compared with normal controls. Conclusions: We found that NGF levels may be applied as a useful biomarker in the diagnosis and evaluation of female patients with BOO symptoms. It will not completely replace other clinical diagnostic tools such as formal urodynamic testing but play a role as a supplement to it. Nevertheless, further studies should be conducted to establish NGF levels as a female BOO biomarker and a routine testing modality.
Purpose of review: Voiding dysfunction (VD) is morbid, costly, and leads to urinary tract infections, stones, sepsis, and permanent renal failure. Evaluation and diagnosis of VD in nonobstructed patients can be challenging. Potential diagnostic and therapeutic options beyond the bladder, such as brain centers involved in voiding have been proposed as promising targets. This review focuses on current and future applications of functional neuroimaging in human in voiding and in patients with VD. Recent findings: The current understanding of brain centers, and their roles in initiating, maintaining and/or modulating voiding, is rudimentary in humans and in patients with VD. With the advent and advancement in functional neuroimaging we are gaining more insight into specific brain regions involved in the voiding phase of micturition. In healthy individuals, right dorsomedial pontine tegmentum, periaqueductal grey, hypothalamus, and the inferior, medial and superior frontal gyrus have been identified as regions of interest in voiding. Summary: Functional neuroimaging could suggest new diagnostic methods and provides crucial steps towards therapeutic options for the morbid and intractable VD condition, in patients with neurogenic (e.g. MS or Strokes) or non-neurogenic VD (e.g. underactive bladder or Fowler's syndrome).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.