2016
DOI: 10.2514/1.a33642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Formulas for Standoff Distance in Front of Spacecraft in Hypersonic Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, at an altitude of 70 km, the shock stand-off distance does not increase at higher velocity of 11 km/s. The trend of increment in the shock stand-off distance with flight speed at higher velocity more than 9 km/s has also been observed in other references (Zander et al , 2014; Hu et al , 2016). By using an expansion tunnel facility, Zander et al (2014) observed a tendency that the shock stand-off distance increases with increment in flight velocity.…”
Section: Flow-field Analysis For Hypersonic Flight Conditionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, at an altitude of 70 km, the shock stand-off distance does not increase at higher velocity of 11 km/s. The trend of increment in the shock stand-off distance with flight speed at higher velocity more than 9 km/s has also been observed in other references (Zander et al , 2014; Hu et al , 2016). By using an expansion tunnel facility, Zander et al (2014) observed a tendency that the shock stand-off distance increases with increment in flight velocity.…”
Section: Flow-field Analysis For Hypersonic Flight Conditionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…(2014) observed a tendency that the shock stand-off distance increases with increment in flight velocity. In a separate study,Hu et al (2016) conducted a numerical study to measure the effect of Mach number on the shock stand-off distance and observed that the…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model proposed in [45] takes into account the geometry of the aircraft head and flow quantities. The approach proposed in [47] allows one to obtain a relation for the standoff distance, the parameters of which are the Mach number and density. The approach is developed in [10], which gives the shock layer thickness as a function of the Mach number and flight altitude, which varies from 25 to 55 km.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many near space hypersonic vehicles, such as X-37 (Gülhan et al, 2014), X-51 (Schimisseur, 2015) and Falcon HTVs (Walker et al, 2008), have been succeeded in their missions, the exploration of aerothermodynamic problems is the principle obstacle because the velocities and altitudes at which these vehicles would operate are different, and sometimes more severe (Huang and Huang, 2015;Hu et al, 2016aHu et al, , 2016bLi et al, 2016), than those went through in the past. As future hypersonic vehicle quests to fly higher and faster, the environment surrounding the vehicle could be more dramatically changed (Hu et al, 2016a(Hu et al, , 2016bCai 2016;Yuan et al, 2017) and more difficult to simulate in ground-based test facilities (Doig et al, 2016), which makes the numerical simulations become increasingly important issues (Park et al, 2016;Boyd et al, 2010). Whether the existing numerical methods can apply to higher velocity is an urgent problem to be solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%