2018
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New forms of competition in higher education1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
120
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion that competition is a central means of assuring and increasing the ‘quality’, ‘performance’ and ‘efficiency’ of higher education has become a defining characteristic of contemporary academia (see Winter ; Musselin ). A key mechanism in this regard is the transition from institutional block grant funding to output‐oriented, project‐based funding.…”
Section: The Ascent Of Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that competition is a central means of assuring and increasing the ‘quality’, ‘performance’ and ‘efficiency’ of higher education has become a defining characteristic of contemporary academia (see Winter ; Musselin ). A key mechanism in this regard is the transition from institutional block grant funding to output‐oriented, project‐based funding.…”
Section: The Ascent Of Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In higher education, we increasingly see colleges and universities race to be at the top of the "best of the best" rankings in everything from diverse demographics to largest grants to online program enrollment (Musselin, 2018). While doing the best is a good goal, with neoliberalism in the driver's seat in higher education, it often comes at the expense of students, staff, and faculty.…”
Section: Higher Education As a Neoliberalist Entitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rankings gave rise to another much more complex scenario in which universities shifted from local competition, i.e. among institutions in the same country/region, to compete globally, with comparisons crossing national borders (Azman & Kutty, 2016;Kauppi, 2018;Marginson, 2007;Musselin, 2018;Ordorika & Lloyd, 2015). Higher education institutions were therefore driven to update their objectives to adapt to the new situation, which included improving their positions on rankings in a bid for prestige as research bodies (Lim & Øerber, 2017;Millot, 2015;Zhang, Bao, & Sun, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher education institutions were therefore driven to update their objectives to adapt to the new situation, which included improving their positions on rankings in a bid for prestige as research bodies (Lim & Øerber, 2017;Millot, 2015;Zhang, Bao, & Sun, 2016). Such competition was heightened by governments' need to enhance access to higher education and strengthen their countries/regions' presence on the list of the most highly reputed universities (Bornman, Mutz, & Daniel, 2013;Guironnet & Peypoch, 2018;Musselin, 2018). Some governments have implemented different types of initiatives to support the internationalisation of their higher education institutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%