2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Finite-Element Formulation for Buckling Analysis of Cracked Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equivalent mass method was only applicable to free vibration analysis. The investigation on the analysis of cracked problems was continued and led to the derivation of the innovative weak form equations for the finite element analysis of cracked beams in Ranjbaran and Rousta [20], a necessary modification for the finite element analysis of cracked members in Ranjbaran et al [21], the square of the Dirac's delta for use in structural mechanics by Ranjbaran [22], new finite element formulation for buckling analysis of cracked structures in Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran [23], and free vibration analysis of stiffened frames in Ranjbaran [24].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent mass method was only applicable to free vibration analysis. The investigation on the analysis of cracked problems was continued and led to the derivation of the innovative weak form equations for the finite element analysis of cracked beams in Ranjbaran and Rousta [20], a necessary modification for the finite element analysis of cracked members in Ranjbaran et al [21], the square of the Dirac's delta for use in structural mechanics by Ranjbaran [22], new finite element formulation for buckling analysis of cracked structures in Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran [23], and free vibration analysis of stiffened frames in Ranjbaran [24].…”
Section: List Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that the initial crack-stiffness matrix as defined in Eq. (27) is not correct and should be modified [44][45][46]! For several bar members and several beam members, via hundreds of trial free vibration analyses, the numerical values for the survive function ( R S ) (A coefficient to be multiplied by the initial crack integral to obtain the correct result) are defined as in Table 2.…”
Section:  (25)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SS k ) and( SS f ), the (ART) detected (great detection)a fact that, the flexibility-and the stiffness-of the crack, as shown in Eq. (45),are proportional to each other (while for structures the stiffness and the flexibility are inverse of each other).Based on the definition of the state functions, the (stiffness) ratio of ( C k ) over ( S k ) is set equal to the state ratio ( R ), which after some manipulation led into an explicit definition for the ( N c )as defined in Eq (46)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aim of the presented work is to propose a certain probability function, based on sound mathematical foundation. Toward the aim, in the first two decades of 21st century, our research team, conducted an extensive research for analysis of phenomena which are partly published in references (Amirian and Ranjbaran, 2019;Baharvand and Ranjbaran, 2020a-b;Ranjbaran et al, 2011;2013;2020a-b;Ranjbaran and Ranjbaran, 2014;2017a-b;2018;Hoseini et al, 2018;Ranjbaran, 2010;. More detailed information may be obtained in (Ranjbaran et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%