2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New finite element developments for the full field modeling of microstructural evolutions using the level-set method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible improvements would be to check whether a unique value of k can really describe the behavior of all types of grains and to check how far the proportionality relationship of Equation (5) is valid. Both issues are non-trivial, but could be investigated using either 3D microscopy, for example near-field HEDM [20], or by generating synthetic microstructures with a controlled initial twin topology and then evolving them with a full field numerical approach, for example in a finite element context, as already implemented for grain growth in a level-set framework [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Relevance Of The New Mean Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible improvements would be to check whether a unique value of k can really describe the behavior of all types of grains and to check how far the proportionality relationship of Equation (5) is valid. Both issues are non-trivial, but could be investigated using either 3D microscopy, for example near-field HEDM [20], or by generating synthetic microstructures with a controlled initial twin topology and then evolving them with a full field numerical approach, for example in a finite element context, as already implemented for grain growth in a level-set framework [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Relevance Of The New Mean Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two approaches are used to create digital microstructures in this case. The first, uses the classical Voronoi tessellation combined with the level set method [70]. The second, is much more complex, expensive, and time consuming and uses data from the synchrotron to reconstruct 3D structures.…”
Section: Methods Of Synthetic Generation Of Microstructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The memory consumption and the domain superimposition with time ( Fig. 7) were studied in order to compare our implementation to global level-set (GLS) approaches from literature [11,15]. To determine the frequency of domain superimposition comparable to the number of GLS, we added up the number of grid points used in all our sub-domains and divided it by the size of the entire domain.…”
Section: Memory Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%