“…Among all the NH 3 -SCR catalysts developed, copper (Cu) and iron (Fe)-exchanged microporous zeolites, and, in particular, small pore-sized chabazite (CHA)-based zeolites, have received much attention because of their high hydrothermal stability and SCR performance. , These zeolites are considered as a competitive alternative to the previous vanadia-based catalysts, − displaying good hydrothermal and sulfur resistance without employing rare metals. , Small-pore ( Ø = 0.38 nm) eight-membered ring (MR) CHA-based catalysts are constituted of a succession of tetrahedral SiO 4 , AlO 4 (SSZ-13 zeolite), and PO 4 (SAPO-34 zeolite) groups according to the zeolite chemical composition. This construction consequently forms a unique organization of cages between 8MR, 6MR, and 4MR interconnections, giving rise to different redox active site configurations within the zeolite lattice. − The active site configuration greatly depends on the catalyst synthesis route and has an important impact on overall SCR performance. , Typically, CHA catalysts are composed of two active sites of different nature: Brønsted and Lewis acid sites.…”