2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New experimental correlations to characterize compressible flow losses at 90-degree T-junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study, the representative of the compressible flow at junctions is the study by Abou-haidar 7 and Perez-Garci. [8][9][10] Abou-Haidar 7 tested the flow losses of T-junctions with different branch angles and different flow ratios over a wide range of airflow Mach numbers. The results revealed that the pressure loss coefficient of branch junction flow is related to the Mach number of the air flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current study, the representative of the compressible flow at junctions is the study by Abou-haidar 7 and Perez-Garci. [8][9][10] Abou-Haidar 7 tested the flow losses of T-junctions with different branch angles and different flow ratios over a wide range of airflow Mach numbers. The results revealed that the pressure loss coefficient of branch junction flow is related to the Mach number of the air flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the internal flow field of the T-junction was not tested in this study. Perez-Garci et al [8][9][10] conducted a pilot study of a pressure loss model in a right-angled T-junction and introduced a new pressure loss coefficient to recharacterize the pressure loss. It was found that for the air flowing through the junction with a higher Mach number, the pressure loss coefficient is related not only to the flow ratio q between the branch pipe and the common pipe but also to the Mach number in the common pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, in all these studies, the results were also concluded in incompressible form, because the experiments were performed only within narrowspeed ranges. The only comprehensive sources of steady flow test data are those provided by Abou-Haidar and Dixon 22 and Perez-Garcia et al [23][24][25] Abou-Haidar and Dixon 22 completed experimental investigations on T-junctions with different branch angles and flow ratios in a wide Mach number range up to chocked flow conditions at junctions. They measured the effects of fluid compressibility on loss coefficients and indicated that the coefficients do vary with Mach number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the public manifold Mach number is greater than 0.2, the pressure loss coefficients between the calculated and experimental were quite different. In papers [7][8][9], some experimental research on the pressure loss model of the exhaust manifold junction of the "T" type was done. The research showed that the pressure loss coefficient was related not only to the flow ratio between the public manifold and branch manifold but also to the Mach number in the public manifold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%