2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-0182(00)00153-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New example of Devonian predatory boreholes and the influence of brachiopod spines on predator success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Carriker and Yochelson (1968) suggested that Ordovician putative predatory drill holes might be epibiont attachment scars'. Several authors have reviewed the criteria for recognizing drill holes as predatory (e.g., Carriker and Yochelson, 1968;Rohr, 1991;Baumiller, 1996;Kaplan and Baumiller, 2000;Leighton, 2001a): perpendicular penetration of the shell surface; regular shape (circular or oval); penetration from the shell exterior; failure to pass through both valves of an articulated bivalved specimen; and non-random distribution of holes with respect to valve, position on the valve, and/or size or type of prey. An additional criterion sometimes used is that only one complete drill hole is present on a specimen, but many exceptions to this criterion occur among modern predatory drillers (see Leighton, 2001a, and below).…”
Section: Data On Drilling Predation Extractable From the Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Carriker and Yochelson (1968) suggested that Ordovician putative predatory drill holes might be epibiont attachment scars'. Several authors have reviewed the criteria for recognizing drill holes as predatory (e.g., Carriker and Yochelson, 1968;Rohr, 1991;Baumiller, 1996;Kaplan and Baumiller, 2000;Leighton, 2001a): perpendicular penetration of the shell surface; regular shape (circular or oval); penetration from the shell exterior; failure to pass through both valves of an articulated bivalved specimen; and non-random distribution of holes with respect to valve, position on the valve, and/or size or type of prey. An additional criterion sometimes used is that only one complete drill hole is present on a specimen, but many exceptions to this criterion occur among modern predatory drillers (see Leighton, 2001a, and below).…”
Section: Data On Drilling Predation Extractable From the Fossil Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of additional interest are drilled juvenile forms of two species, L. brownendensis and L. glaphyra (Morris 1994;Bassett & Bryant 1993). It is worth noting that the highest drilling frequencies ever reported for Paleozoic brachiopods are con®ned to small taxa (Leighton 2001; this study). These high Fig.…”
Section: Stereotypy Patternsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Only a few studies have reported occurrences where the frequency of drilling on brachiopods exceeds 10% (Brunton & Champion 1974;Smith et al 1985;Baumiller et al 1999;Leighton 2001). This generally low frequency of predation may be related to the energy budget of the predator (low nutrient gain from the prey; see Kitchell et al 1981), the lifestyle of the predator (drilling may have been facultative), the low relative abundance of the predator, or some form of defense and/or toxicity of brachiopod prey (Thayer 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This animal is able to scratch calcium carbonate shelled competitors by rapid motions of its shell (LaBerbera 1985). Unlike molluscan calcium carbonate shells and calcitic brachiopod shells (Leighton 2001(Leighton , 2003Hoffmeister et al 2003;Kelley & Hansen 2003), there are very few recorded cases of predatory borings or piercing on organophosphatic fossil • B -X-ray powder diffraction pattern of Mesoconularia (?) lukesi francolite from the angular range of 10-55°, which was used for calculation of its lattice parameters after substraction goethite diffractions (contaminat ion of conulariid test surface).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%