2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New exact solutions of the conformable time-fractional Cahn–Allen and Cahn–Hilliard equations using the modified Kudryashov method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Since most of the complex phenomena are modeled mathematically by nonlinear fractional differential equations, there are many methods in the literature to solve these equations. The Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations are studied through distinct techniques such as reduced differential transform method, 34 the modified Kudryashov technique, 35 Adomian decomposition method (ADM), 36 improved (G ′ /G) − expansion method, 37 homotopy perturbation method (HPM), 26 residual power series method (RPSM), 22 and many others. 38,39 In this framework, we employ two distinct and efficient techniques, ie, fractional natural decomposition method (FNDM) and q-homotopy analysis transform methodq-HATM, to find the solution for both cited equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Since most of the complex phenomena are modeled mathematically by nonlinear fractional differential equations, there are many methods in the literature to solve these equations. The Gardner and Cahn-Hilliard equations are studied through distinct techniques such as reduced differential transform method, 34 the modified Kudryashov technique, 35 Adomian decomposition method (ADM), 36 improved (G ′ /G) − expansion method, 37 homotopy perturbation method (HPM), 26 residual power series method (RPSM), 22 and many others. 38,39 In this framework, we employ two distinct and efficient techniques, ie, fractional natural decomposition method (FNDM) and q-homotopy analysis transform methodq-HATM, to find the solution for both cited equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amalgamation of Taylor's series expansion and DE algorithm, name as TOM, considered in this attempt, exhibits a remarkable tool to acquire the effective solutions of functions together with the globally optimized values of the error function. In addition to this, the illustrative examples, considered with conformable fractional derivative [5,6,10], elevated the efficiency, stability and appropriateness of TOM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reason that the non-local properties of fractional operator enable these differential models to put the information, about the recent and the historical situation, in a nutshell [1]. For the last decades, many enlargements have been made in this regard to explore enhanced definitions and properties in order to overcome the inadequacies of previous definitions of fractional calculus, such as, He's fractional derivative [3], Atangana-Baleanu fractional derivative [4], Caputo and Fabrizio [5], conformable derivative [6], etc. Consequently, these novel aspects enrich the capabilities of fractional differential models in bringing diverse physical significances to light [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, by developing a specific transformation, a partial differential equation can be converted into an ordinary differential equation. This conversion causes the produced ordinary differential equation to be solved readily by means of a group of powerful approaches, such as functional variable method [1][2][3], first integral method [4][5][6][7], exp-function method [8][9][10], modified trial equation method [11][12][13], the Kudryashov methods [14][15][16][17][18][19] and so on. The modified Kudryashov method is considered as one of the most robust techniques which has been developed for solving nonlinear differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%