2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcaf.22525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New evidence on practical implications of the CAPM

Abstract: The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has received tremendous attention since 1964. One of the main aspects of the model is a linear relationship between the coefficient of systematic risk, beta, and expected stock returns. This linear relationship is tested with non-parametric estimation. While the linear relationship is sustainable, the parabolic relationship is rejected significantly. The result is a strong support for the CAPM. Linear non-parametric estimation produces better predictions, which can benefi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several decades later, the CAPM is still widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of equity capital for firms and evaluating the performance of investment, often the only asset pricing model taught in MBA-level investment courses [27]. The model explains the linear relationship between the systematic risk coefficient, beta, and expected stock returns (Wang et al, 2017;Anjum and Rajput, 2021;and Taussig, 2022) [28][29][30]. The basic concept of the CAPM is a metric that explains expected excess return, beta risk, and the market risk premium by calculating the difference between an asset's return and the risk-free rate (Anuno, Madaleno, and Vieira, 2023) [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several decades later, the CAPM is still widely used in applications, such as estimating the cost of equity capital for firms and evaluating the performance of investment, often the only asset pricing model taught in MBA-level investment courses [27]. The model explains the linear relationship between the systematic risk coefficient, beta, and expected stock returns (Wang et al, 2017;Anjum and Rajput, 2021;and Taussig, 2022) [28][29][30]. The basic concept of the CAPM is a metric that explains expected excess return, beta risk, and the market risk premium by calculating the difference between an asset's return and the risk-free rate (Anuno, Madaleno, and Vieira, 2023) [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional CAPM (Lintner, 1965; Sharpe, 1964) and (Black, 1972) explains the required return on each stock, based on the coefficient of systematic risk (Beta) and a risk premium. For example, the CAPM was tested by new empirical methods (Taussig, 2022b) and was found to be significant. Algebaly (2022) supports the validity of the conditional CAPM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this principle, Lintner (1965), Mossin (1966), and Sharpe (1964) are considered pioneers and developers of the concept of the CAPM. The model explains the linear relationship between the systematic risk coefficient, beta, and expected stock returns (Wang et al 2017;Anjum and Rajput 2021;Taussig 2022). Moreover, the basic concept of the CAPM is a metric that explains expected excess return, beta risk, and the market risk premium by calculating the difference between an asset's return and the risk-free rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%