2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New evidence from Bouldnor Cliff for technological innovation in the Mesolithic, population dispersal and use of drowned landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Around the southern North Sea basin on the continental mainland, clear similarities between the Late Mesolithic records of lowland Europe and southern Scandinavia/northern Germany suggest contact if not some degree of cultural continuity. The British Mesolithic shows some signs of divergence archaeologically, traditionally seen as lacking trapezoid microliths (although see Warren 2015), but it is unlikely that contact with communities across the water ceased entirely (e.g., Anderson-Whymark et al, 2015;Elliott 2015;Elliott et al, 2020;Momber et al, 2021). While it is not clear that there was not contact across extended distances over land and water between these regions when the Storegga tsunami hit, it does at least appear that different regional traditions had become established with regards to technology, raw material exploitation, landscape utilization and sites.…”
Section: Shared Event Yet Distinct Mesolithic Histories Of Vulnerability and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around the southern North Sea basin on the continental mainland, clear similarities between the Late Mesolithic records of lowland Europe and southern Scandinavia/northern Germany suggest contact if not some degree of cultural continuity. The British Mesolithic shows some signs of divergence archaeologically, traditionally seen as lacking trapezoid microliths (although see Warren 2015), but it is unlikely that contact with communities across the water ceased entirely (e.g., Anderson-Whymark et al, 2015;Elliott 2015;Elliott et al, 2020;Momber et al, 2021). While it is not clear that there was not contact across extended distances over land and water between these regions when the Storegga tsunami hit, it does at least appear that different regional traditions had become established with regards to technology, raw material exploitation, landscape utilization and sites.…”
Section: Shared Event Yet Distinct Mesolithic Histories Of Vulnerability and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today it is 0.25m above CD. At the time of construction it Momber et al, 2011, Ke and Collins, 2002Momber et al, 2021Smith, 2015Momber et al, 2011;Momber and Peeters, 2017;Momber, 2021 would have been positioned around the mean tide level, being c.2.5m above CD, and covered by the sea for half the tidal cycle. It is not substantial enough to survive in open water so it would have been built in a sheltered intertidal creek where it was protected by the coastal mudflats and salt marsh (Figure 10).…”
Section: Marine Archaeological Sites As Indicators Of Changementioning
confidence: 99%