1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70124-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New evidence for neurobehavioral effects of in utero cocaine exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
132
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
8
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The poorer novelty preferences of the heavily cocaine-exposed group in the present study are consistent with the lower visual recognition memory performance scores noted in heavily cocaine-exposed infants at 6 1/2 and 12 months of age in prior studies (Jacobson et al, 1996;Struthers & Hansen, 1992). In the perinatal period, other investigators have found cocaine-exposed neonates to demonstrate poorer habituation (which includes reaction to the repeated presentation of a visual stimulus) on the NBAS (Eisen et al, 1991;Mayes et al, 1993), poorer orientation (Mirochnick et al, 1997;Delaney-Black et al, 1996), and to demonstrate deficits in arousal-modulated attention similar to those noted in neonates with central nervous system compromise (Gardner, Karmel, & Magnano, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The poorer novelty preferences of the heavily cocaine-exposed group in the present study are consistent with the lower visual recognition memory performance scores noted in heavily cocaine-exposed infants at 6 1/2 and 12 months of age in prior studies (Jacobson et al, 1996;Struthers & Hansen, 1992). In the perinatal period, other investigators have found cocaine-exposed neonates to demonstrate poorer habituation (which includes reaction to the repeated presentation of a visual stimulus) on the NBAS (Eisen et al, 1991;Mayes et al, 1993), poorer orientation (Mirochnick et al, 1997;Delaney-Black et al, 1996), and to demonstrate deficits in arousal-modulated attention similar to those noted in neonates with central nervous system compromise (Gardner, Karmel, & Magnano, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Cocaine exposure, however, was confounded with exposure to other illicit drugs and alcohol in addition to cocaine. In a large, well controlled study, Jacobson and colleagues (Jacobson, Jacobson, Sokol, Martier, & Chiodo, 1996) tested non-cocaine exposed and cocaine-exposed infants at 6.5 and 12 months corrected ages, and found that infants with history of heavy cocaine exposure, even after accounting for the effects of other drugs, had poorer recognition memory performance on the Fagan Test, while lightly exposed infants were comparable to non-exposed controls. These studies suggest that in utero cocaine exposure may affect infant visual selectivity and cognitive development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers concluded that impairments in initial reactivity and selectivity toward novel stimuli may exist in a select sub-group of cocaine-exposed infants, such as infants exposed to a high level of cocaine. Findings of S. W. Jacobson, J. L. Jacobson, Sokol, Martier, and Chiodo (1996) supported the hypothesis that heavy but not light cocaine exposure is more likely to have negative consequences. They found that heavy cocaine exposure was related to poorer recognition memory and information processing than was light or no cocaine exposure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Because of concerns for the safety our staff in carrying out home visits, we administered a version of the HOME scale (36) that was modified for use in the office following recommendations by Jacobson et al (37). The modified HOME scale entailed devising a scripted conversation to cover mother-child activities but omitted items that require direct observation (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%