2002
DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2002.123308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New equations for calculating the components of energy expenditure in infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are little data to support the scientific notion that energy expenditure and basic metabolic rate are the same in infants and in older children (16,17). Previous studies using an infant respiratory chamber directly quantitated energy expenditure and basal metabolic rates in infants from 3 to 4 mo of age and found some differences from World Health Organization figures, particularly in those with HIV or other causes of growth retardation (20,21). When measured over longer times (24 h) the energy expenditure in active infants was underestimated by the Schofield equation (16,20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are little data to support the scientific notion that energy expenditure and basic metabolic rate are the same in infants and in older children (16,17). Previous studies using an infant respiratory chamber directly quantitated energy expenditure and basal metabolic rates in infants from 3 to 4 mo of age and found some differences from World Health Organization figures, particularly in those with HIV or other causes of growth retardation (20,21). When measured over longer times (24 h) the energy expenditure in active infants was underestimated by the Schofield equation (16,20,21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies using an infant respiratory chamber directly quantitated energy expenditure and basal metabolic rates in infants from 3 to 4 mo of age and found some differences from World Health Organization figures, particularly in those with HIV or other causes of growth retardation (20,21). When measured over longer times (24 h) the energy expenditure in active infants was underestimated by the Schofield equation (16,20,21). However, there were no differences between inferred and directly measured resting metabolic rates (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, all metabolic measurements were conducted under standard conditions [4] at the same time in the morning between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM. It is possible that variations in energy expenditure over the course of 24-hours, as shown by the presence of the metabolic circadian rhythm [6], might contribute to inherent inaccuracies when utilizing the World Health Organization [1], the Schofield [2] and the Oxford [3] prediction equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specific, six of these equations (Table 2) were from a previous study in our laboratory [4] where 50 short-term metabolic measurements in infants of four-hours in the EMTAC were used in their derivation. These consisted of two equations for 24-hour EE based on both length and weight (EMTACEE-LWT) and weight (EMTACEE-WT), two equations for RMR based on both length and weight (EMTACRMR-LWT) and weight (EMTACRMR-WT) and finally, two equations for SMR based on both length and weight (EMTACSMR-LWT) and weight (EMTACSMR-WT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation