2019
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Emission Factors for Calculation of Ammonia Volatilization From European Livestock Manure Management Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional indirect N 2 O emissions from NH 3 volatilization in the cowshed were calculated according to Burgos et al (2010). The emission factor (EF) for NH 3 volatilization from grazing animals were based on a review analysis of Sommer et al (2019). Other gaseous N-emissions during manure application followed the methodology of the IPCC guidelines (IPCC, 2006;Mogensen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Product Carbon Footprint (Pcf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional indirect N 2 O emissions from NH 3 volatilization in the cowshed were calculated according to Burgos et al (2010). The emission factor (EF) for NH 3 volatilization from grazing animals were based on a review analysis of Sommer et al (2019). Other gaseous N-emissions during manure application followed the methodology of the IPCC guidelines (IPCC, 2006;Mogensen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Product Carbon Footprint (Pcf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described in Smit et al (2020) [ 9 ], this could be due to within-field N cycling and high N returned to pastures by grazing animals, which provides the majority of N in the system. Taking N-losses from ammonia volatilization into account, which have been found to be between 5 and 20% in different studies [ 29 , 43 ], pasture systems play a role in mitigating N volatilization, and thus have the potential to improve on-farm N-cycling compared to confinement systems [ 44 ]. Moreover, pasture herbage at our study site is typically supplemented with concentrates of 4–6 kg cow −1 day −1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average daily DM intake of feed by cows was estimated according to the equation from Gruber et al (2004) [ 28 ], whereas differences of DM intake between the different treatments occurred due to the different potential milk yields from offered herbage in the prevailing pasture treatments. Indirect sources of GHG emissions as NH 3 volatilization from N ex during grazing were based on a review analysis of Sommer et al (2019) [ 29 ], where a factor of 0.65 for total ammonium N (TAN) was used. Additional N-leaching losses were calcualted according to the IPCC 2019 guidelines [ 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) reference data are based on North Europe information, but it is well-known that N in manure may differ among European countries and locations [9][10][11]. Consequently, it is imperative to precisely describe N manure production under different climate scenarios and husbandry systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%