The optimal selection of sensor structures
improves the knowledge
of the current plant state, which is a central issue for the decision-making
process. Instrumentation design is a challenging optimization problem
that involves a huge amount of binary variables that represent the
possible sensor locations. In this work, the limitations of the current
design strategies are discussed, and they support the application of evolutionary solution methods.
Among them, the estimation of distribution algorithms (EDAs) arises
as a convenient alternative to solving the problem. These are stochastic
optimization strategies devised to capture complex interactions among
problem variables by learning the probabilistic model of candidate
solutions and its sampling to generate the next population. From the
broad spectrum of EDAs that use multivariate models, two representative
procedures are selected that significantly differ in the methods used
for learning and sampling those models. Furthermore, a comparative
performance study is conducted to evaluate the benefits of increasing
the complexity of the distribution model with respect to a memetic
procedure based on univariate models.