2018
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1545231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Effect Size Measures for Structural Equation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The required sample to conduct a structural model for a given number of latent and observed variables, expected effect size, and desired statistical power is calculated using a web-based calculator by Soper (2019). With 14 latent and 9 observed variables, a medium effect size of 0.3 (Gomer et al, 2018), desired statistical power of 0.8 (Cohen, 1988;Westland, 2010), and 0.05 level of significance the recommended minimum sample to detect an effect in the present structural model is 208. Therefore, according to statistical recommendations the present sample size of 466 falls within the limits of a moderate effect size.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required sample to conduct a structural model for a given number of latent and observed variables, expected effect size, and desired statistical power is calculated using a web-based calculator by Soper (2019). With 14 latent and 9 observed variables, a medium effect size of 0.3 (Gomer et al, 2018), desired statistical power of 0.8 (Cohen, 1988;Westland, 2010), and 0.05 level of significance the recommended minimum sample to detect an effect in the present structural model is 208. Therefore, according to statistical recommendations the present sample size of 466 falls within the limits of a moderate effect size.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Ropovik (2015), “a significant chi-square does not necessarily imply a useless model” and fit indices can assist in differentiating between a model that retains some merit despite misspecifications and a model that is grossly incorrect and should be discarded (Millsap, 2007). However, over time, fit indices have migrated into being used as binary arbiters of fit and function as ad hoc hypothesis tests—much like the χ 2 test—rather than a supplement to quantify the magnitude of misfit (Gomer et al, 2019, p. 372).…”
Section: Fit Indices As a Continuum Not An Ad Hoc Hypothesis Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors such as Hair et al (2018) and Kline (2016) considered that a sample size greater than 250 is sufficient in CB-SEM to minimize the impact of sampling error. In this sense, the sample of the present study is considered adequate to carry out the analysis and verify the research hypotheses (Gomer et al, 2019).…”
Section: H5mentioning
confidence: 99%