2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Early to Middle Triassic U–Pb ages from South China: Calibration with ammonoid biochronozones and implications for the timing of the Triassic biotic recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
126
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, Inset from this study and Cao et al (11). Remainder of carbonate carbon isotopic composition from Payne et al (52) and geochronology from Galfetti et al (54). Permian and Triassic conodont zones from Ogg et al (63).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, Inset from this study and Cao et al (11). Remainder of carbonate carbon isotopic composition from Payne et al (52) and geochronology from Galfetti et al (54). Permian and Triassic conodont zones from Ogg et al (63).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U-Pb dating of perovskites in the early Arydzhangsky flow and zircons from the late Delkansky silicic tuff of extrusive suites in the Maymecha-Kotuy region suggests that the STLIP flood basalt eruptions commenced at 251.7 ± 0.4 Ma and ended at 251.1 ± 0.3 Ma, i.e., representing an interval of ∼ 600 kyr (Renne et al, 1995;Kamo et al, 2003). However, an Ar-Ar date of 250.3 ± 1.1 Ma was obtained for the final stage of extrusive volcanism at Norilsk, the core area of the STLIP (Reichow et al, 2009; see also the review of evidence for a late eruptive stage by Ovtcharova et al, 2006). The more critical issue, in any case, is the duration not of flood basalt eruptions but of intrusive magmatism in the West Siberian Coal Basin, which was probably the main source of volcanogenic greenhouse gases (Retallack and Jahren, 2008;Black et al, 2012).…”
Section: Causes and Consequences Of The Ssb Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age constraints were provided by chemical abrasion-thermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-TIMS) studies of U-Pb in zircons, from which the dates of the Induan-Olenekian and SmithianSpathian boundaries were estimated at ∼ 251.25 Ma and ∼ 250.55 Ma, respectively (Ovtcharova et al, 2006), and that of the Olenekian-Anisian boundary was estimated at ∼ 247.3 Ma . These dates yield durations for the Smithian and Spathian substages of ∼ 0.7 and ∼ 3.25 Myr, respectively.…”
Section: Age Model and Sediment Flux Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Induan-Olenekian boundary is dated at 251.3 Ma by Mundil et al (2010) and at 251.22 ± 0.20 Ma (Ovtcharova et al, 2006;Burgess et al, 2014) but at 250.00 Ma in the new Geologic Timescale 2012 . The new younger age for this boundary in Gradstein et al (2012) is based on cyclo/magnetostratigraphy and ammonoid data.…”
Section: Induan-olenekian Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%