2020
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2020.4966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New drugs are not enough‑drug repositioning in oncology: An update

Abstract: Drug repositioning refers to the concept of discovering novel clinical benefits of drugs that are already known for use treating other diseases. The advantages of this are that several important drug characteristics are already established (including efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and toxicity), making the process of research for a putative drug quicker and less costly. Drug repositioning in oncology has received extensive focus. The present review summarizes the most prominent examples of drug r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 529 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we propose an alternative approach based on the use of non-oncological drugs for OC treatment. This concept, called drug repurposing, is based on the knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, target identification, bioavailability, toxicity profiles, recommended dosage schemes, and consistent recognition of adverse effects, meaning that oncological indication development can begin at phase II of the clinical trials, making the research process less time-consuming and less expensive [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The incorporation of non-oncological drugs for cancer treatment is usually combined with chemotherapeutic agents, target therapies, or other repurposed drugs [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we propose an alternative approach based on the use of non-oncological drugs for OC treatment. This concept, called drug repurposing, is based on the knowledge of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, target identification, bioavailability, toxicity profiles, recommended dosage schemes, and consistent recognition of adverse effects, meaning that oncological indication development can begin at phase II of the clinical trials, making the research process less time-consuming and less expensive [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The incorporation of non-oncological drugs for cancer treatment is usually combined with chemotherapeutic agents, target therapies, or other repurposed drugs [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is probably that the optimal chemical structures are complex and difficult to synthesize, and are therefore associated with high research costs. The use of a simple scaf- fold is based on the low-risk approach and is very similar to the repurposing strategy (32). However, the present study has some limitations, considering the use of only one chemical repository.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment schemes for xenotransplated mice with HCT116 are depicted in Figure 4A,B. Treatment began when xenotrasplants reached 50 mm 3 . The administration of AA at 250 mg/kg once weekly for three weeks reduced tumor growth in 49.19% ( Figure 5A).…”
Section: Aa Inhibited Tumor Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the last two decades the overall survival rate has doubled, reaching an estimated median survival expectancy of 20 months. The latter is largely due to new therapeutic approaches that rely on the combined administration of novel molecular agents with well-known cytotoxic agents, or drug repositioning [3]. The former are modern agents first approved for medical use between the first decade of 2000 (e.g., bevacizumab, panitumumab, cetuximab, aflibercept, and regorafenib), whereas the second have a longer history of use (e.g., oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine), with only a few being more modern (e.g., trifluridine/tipiracil) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%