2015
DOI: 10.1017/s027226311500008x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Directions in the Study of Implicit and Explicit Learning

Abstract: It has been exactly 10 years since Studies in Second Language Acquisition published a thematic issue on the topic of implicit and explicit second language (L2) learning, edited by Jan Hulstijn and Rod Ellis (2005). This seminal issue consisted of a brief general introduction (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because gender awareness seems to have been a prerequisite for predictive awareness to develop (all prediction‐aware learners were also gender aware), our data strongly suggest that prediction awareness was the endpoint of the learning process (attained only by some) that ultimately led to predictive behavior. This pattern of development is in line with a heavily debated claim in SLA research that structures have to be noticed before they can be learned (e.g., Schmidt, ; see Andringa & Rebuschat, , for a discussion) and reminiscent of Bialystok's () analysis and control framework, in which she proposed that language learning is essentially a process of developing awareness for the structure of language and learning to use that structure effortlessly. The results are also in line with Brooks and Kempe (), who also clearly observed that self‐developed awareness was the best predictor of L2 learning in their artificial language learning study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because gender awareness seems to have been a prerequisite for predictive awareness to develop (all prediction‐aware learners were also gender aware), our data strongly suggest that prediction awareness was the endpoint of the learning process (attained only by some) that ultimately led to predictive behavior. This pattern of development is in line with a heavily debated claim in SLA research that structures have to be noticed before they can be learned (e.g., Schmidt, ; see Andringa & Rebuschat, , for a discussion) and reminiscent of Bialystok's () analysis and control framework, in which she proposed that language learning is essentially a process of developing awareness for the structure of language and learning to use that structure effortlessly. The results are also in line with Brooks and Kempe (), who also clearly observed that self‐developed awareness was the best predictor of L2 learning in their artificial language learning study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(), who manipulated intentionality in a within‐participants design and found that the effects of prediction were more pronounced in the task in which participants were explicitly invited to predict. The role of awareness in SLA has been intensively debated and studied (for reviews, see Andringa & Rebuschat, ; Leow & Donatelli, ; Rebuschat, ), for example, within the context of instructed L2 learning. Some studies have used online processing measures to determine what kind of processing learners can achieve after brief exposure to novel linguistic structures (e.g., Andringa & Curcic, ; Batterink & Neville, ; Davidson & Indefrey, ; Marsden, Williams, & Liu, ; Morgan‐Short, Sanz, Steinhauer, & Ullman, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key issues in second language acquisition (SLA) is the role of explicit and implicit knowledge in L2 learning. In fact, the key point in explicit-implicit distinction is to assess the possibility of learning without awareness (Andringa & Rebuschat, 2015). In other words, the main difference between explicit and implicit knowledge lies in the fact that whether learners are aware of what they know (Godfroid, Loewen, Jung, Park, Gass, & Ellis, 2015).…”
Section: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge Interface Hypothesis And Wcfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First language acquisition is frequently cited as a process that occurs implicitly (without awareness) and results in a tacit knowledge base (e.g., Ellis, 2002, 2008, 2011; Reber, 1967; Williams, 2009). However, whether implicit processes are involved in second language (L2) learning has been the focal point of much debate in recent years (see, e.g., the contributions in Andringa & Rebuschat, 2015; Hulstijn & Ellis, 2005; Rebuschat, 2015). Included in this debate is a renewed interest in the product of learning, specifically the degree that different exposure conditions lead to the development of implicit and/or explicit knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%