New directions in New Zealand local government

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a ‘work in progress’ report on some initiatives emerging from local government practice in New Zealand which should help us consider how we think about the role of local government in a world which is undergoing dramatic change. The starting point is work which the writer undertook with the support of Local Government New Zealand (the national association) and a number of New Zealand councils considering the ‘proper role’ of local government. The context is an ongoing public debate driven substantially by the New Zealand business community from a perspective that this ‘proper role’ should be restricted to the delivery of local public goods, narrowly defined. This has included argument that local governments themselves should be structured substantially to promote the efficient delivery of services generally within the now well understood prescriptions of the ‘new public management’. One implication which the business sector in particular drew in looking at the workings of local government was that there should be economies of scale through further amalgamation of councils (the local government sector having been through a major amalgamation process in 1989 which eliminated a large number of special purpose authorities and reduced the number of territorial local authorities from more than 200 to 73). Debate continues, with the latest manifestation being the National Party led government's proposals for the restructuring of local government within the Auckland region, New Zealand's major metropolitan area. The initiatives discussed in this paper are partly a response, but more significantly a result of selected local authorities reflecting on the nature of their role, and the opportunities for being proactive in using their statutory privileges in ways that could produce benefits for their communities without any associated increase in the cost of local government itself.

Filling the gaps in local governance: an analysis of the structure and process of informal community governance in Ibadan, Nigeria

“…The extent to which formal government (central, state or municipal) and private sector interests are represented in the community governance process is a critical issue. According to the literature, community governance may or may not involve one or more of the several levels of government, civil society institutions, and private sector interests (McKinlay 1999;Totikidis et al 2005). Governments are actively involved in community governance in most countries across Europe and America (Totikidis et al 2005;Wills and Harding 2021), and across Asia (Acharya 2016;Zhang et al 2021).…”

Emerging Practices in Intergovernmental Functional Assignment

“…The general competence model has several names around the world, and even within some federations: it is called just that in Canada (Lidstone, 2004) and New Zealand (McKinlay, 2010); 'home rule' in the USA; 'general mandate' in Cambodia; it was known as 'well-being power' in the UK (2000/2003) where it has recently been updated to 'general power of competence' (Sanford, 2016). The differences in name suggests some content differences as well; these can be substantial.…”

Financial planning in metropolitan municipalities-lessons for South Africa from selected countries

“…Further east, New Zealand underwent changes to their municipal structures (including the amalgamation of municipalities) in 1989. That motivating legislation included the twin requirements of long‐term planning and statutory community involvement and further redefined the role of local government with the aim of improving the efficiency of operations, transparency and accountability (McKinlay, , p. 159). Likewise, South Africa has been amalgamating municipalities since 1994, with the aim of improving service delivery and eradicating inequality.…”