2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23491-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Directions in Language Learning Strategy Research: Engaging with the Complexity of Strategy Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded that LLS use has been studied extensively in recent decades. Most research has found that LLS cannot be analysed separately; it must be examined in relation to certain other factors, among which foreign language attitudes and proficiency play a central role ( Griffiths and Incecay, 2016 ). However, most previous studies preferred university students or adults to primary or secondary school-aged students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be concluded that LLS use has been studied extensively in recent decades. Most research has found that LLS cannot be analysed separately; it must be examined in relation to certain other factors, among which foreign language attitudes and proficiency play a central role ( Griffiths and Incecay, 2016 ). However, most previous studies preferred university students or adults to primary or secondary school-aged students.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most of the research pertaining to LLS focuses on good language learners (e.g. Naiman et, al, 1975, Mohamed Amin Embi, 19962000) factors influencing choice of LLS (Oxford & Nyikos,1989;Khamkhien, 2010;Genc and Aydin, 2011;El-Omari, 2016), relationship among LLS (Griffiths & Inceçay;Varasteh, Ghanizadeh & Akbari, 2016) variables of individual differences and learning outcomes (Schmidt, 2012;Riding and Rayner, 2015;Entwistle and Ramsden, 2015). Besides, Bidabadi and Yamat (2011), Razak et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another reason is that frequency count might not be a valid instrument to measure strategy use (Oxford, 2017;Cai & Kunnan, 2020). Rather, the efficiency of strategy use (i.e., doing things rightly) is likely to matter more (Grabe & Stoller, 2011;Griffiths & Inceçay, 2016;Oxford, 2017;Cai & Kunnan, 2020). The validity of frequency and efficiency of strategy use warrants further examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To present a more meaningful picture, data of other background factors should be gathered through other methods like interview, thus pointing to the importance of adopting mixedmethod approach in studying strategy use and the effect on language performance. Furthermore, Griffiths and Inceçay (2016) mentioned that Likert scales are by nature ordinal and do not generate numerical data. However, most studies of strategy use performed parametric tests such as Pearson product-moment test of correlation, t tests, ANOVAs, and SEM to analyze means, which are not the correct analysis procedures despite the fact that results produced by non-parametric tests do not differ widely from those by parametric test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%