New Dimension to Green Buildings: Turning Green into Occupant Well-Being

Abstract

A series of international conferences and initiatives, such as the Habitat III New Urban Agenda and UN Sustainable Development Goals, have urged industry, scholars, and policymakers to create an inclusive and sustainable built environment for all in the coming era of cities. Green building schemes, which have been gaining momentum over recent decades, are one of the most influential measures that have been taken to promote urban sustainability. However, due to disciplinary characteristics, most current studies share a techno-engineering focus. Seldom do they answer the question: will green buildings make a difference to the occupants? This paper explains how, and to what extent, green features and design contribute to different dimensions of occupant well-being by conducting a systematic and comprehensive review of current journal articles and industrial reports. It provides an alternative, occupant-oriented perspective to the conventional discourse. A conceptual framework is developed, revealing that green building aspects are linked to six dimensions (three subjective and three objective) of occupant well-being. It further shows how different green features are linked with these dimensions through a detailed examination of the literature. Finally, suggestions are provided based on the research findings for the direction of future green building development and empirical research.

Crafting Sustainable Healthcare Environments Using Green Building Ratings for Aging Societies

“…The Health and Wellbeing (HWB) indicator emerges as the most influential factor, holding the highest weight. This aligns with current GBRS research trends that emphasize the indoor environment's quality and its substantial impact on the health and comfort of occupants [55,58,83]. Researchers like Ascione, De Masi, Mastellone, and Vanoli [39] have underscored the importance of assigning strong weight to HWB in rating systems.…”

“…Today it is one of the popular and accepted rating tools in the commercial and residential markets in the world next to LEED. Distinct from traditional systems like LEED, BREEAM, Green Star, and IGBC, which are primarily focused on the environmental sustainability of buildings, WELL uniquely concentrates on enhancing the health and wellbeing of building occupants [83]. This human-centered approach is especially pertinent to healthcare facilities, transcending mere structural considerations to emphasize aspects such as patient comfort, staff wellbeing, and stringent hygienic standards, which are crucial in these settings.…”

Study on the Characteristics of Spatial Evolution and Influencing Factors of Green Buildings in China

“…Environmental factors play a pivotal role in shaping the spatial configuration of green buildings in China. Central to the evaluation of green buildings are considerations of durability and safety, comfort and health, ease of living, resource conservation, environmental livability, and the realization of energy, land, water, and material savings throughout the building's life cycle [22,23]. The most influential factor among environmental indicators in explaining the spatial distribution of green buildings in China is the total energy consumption of the entire community, reaching an average of 0.475 (p < 0.05).…”

Rejuvenating the Market for Earth-Based Building Construction Materials in a Developing Economy

“…Earth-based materials are green building materials that are used to construct green buildings (GB), which have a range of goals globally, particularly in the areas of climate change and economic growth acceleration. These buildings save money, enhance occupants' performance and productivity, improve occupants' health, reduce waste, and improve water, energy, and resource efficiencies [36]. When used and managed correctly, earth-based materials do not cause the same level of resource depletion, increased waste generation and pollution, or biological changes as imported conventional materials [37].…”