Light-Emitting Diodes: Materials, Devices, and Applications for Solid State Lighting XVIII 2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2039078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New developments on high-efficiency infrared and InGaAlP light-emitting diodes at OSRAM Opto Semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The g CQE ¼ 0.70 reported here exceeds the CQE records (g CQE ¼ 0.63) we have reported previously 14,15 and also slightly exceeds the highest EQE g EQE ¼ 0.68 reported for GaAs based LEDs in the literature. 3 While directly comparing the EQE of established GaAs LEDs and our devices' CQE is not straightforward, we nevertheless point out that they both provide a lower limit for the IQE; thus, our result increases the directly measured lower bound for the IQE of GaAs based LEDs. 3 For further device optimization and better understanding of the physical processes taking place in the DDS, it is important to separately analyse the losses in the LED and the PD parts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The g CQE ¼ 0.70 reported here exceeds the CQE records (g CQE ¼ 0.63) we have reported previously 14,15 and also slightly exceeds the highest EQE g EQE ¼ 0.68 reported for GaAs based LEDs in the literature. 3 While directly comparing the EQE of established GaAs LEDs and our devices' CQE is not straightforward, we nevertheless point out that they both provide a lower limit for the IQE; thus, our result increases the directly measured lower bound for the IQE of GaAs based LEDs. 3 For further device optimization and better understanding of the physical processes taking place in the DDS, it is important to separately analyse the losses in the LED and the PD parts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…3 While directly comparing the EQE of established GaAs LEDs and our devices' CQE is not straightforward, we nevertheless point out that they both provide a lower limit for the IQE; thus, our result increases the directly measured lower bound for the IQE of GaAs based LEDs. 3 For further device optimization and better understanding of the physical processes taking place in the DDS, it is important to separately analyse the losses in the LED and the PD parts. Since this is not possible through direct measurements, we estimate the magnitude of the losses using the ABC-model and the equivalent circuit described above, following the widely adopted assumptions used, e.g., for estimating and modeling the IQE of GaAs LEDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…One of the obstacles for more extensive penetration of solid‐state lighting into human life is the substantial efficiency reduction of both III‐nitride and III‐phosphide LEDs in the spectral range between 500 nm and 600 nm, which is known as the ‘green gap' problem . In the case of phosphide LEDs, the efficiency reduction is attributed to (i) suppression of radiative recombination caused by filling up the X‐valleys of the conduction band with electrons and (ii) leakage of electrons into p‐side of an LED structure over insufficiently high barriers formed in the conduction band due to low offsets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best light‐extraction efficiency for a 1 × 1 mm 2 high‐power thin‐film GaN blue LED is reported to be 80–90% . For a similar AlGaInP red LED, the reported light‐extraction efficiency is typically in the range of 30–40%, though a light‐extraction efficiency as high as ≈65% has been reported recently from a state‐of‐the‐art commercial device . Other techniques such as photonic crystals, moth‐eye structures, micro domes have also been extensively studied to further improve the light‐extraction efficiency of LEDs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%