2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Developments in Performance Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
123
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
123
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This influence depends in turn on many factors, such as perceptions of performance outcome controllability (GHOSH;LUSCH, 2000;GIRAUD;LANGEVIN;MENDOZA, 2008) and performance evaluation fairness (LATHAM et al, 2005;KELLY;VANCE;WEBB, 2010). We extend this literature by investigating whether organizational factors that affect the measurability of managerial performance are associated with perceptions of performance outcome controllability and whether perceived controllability is associated with performance evaluation fairness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This influence depends in turn on many factors, such as perceptions of performance outcome controllability (GHOSH;LUSCH, 2000;GIRAUD;LANGEVIN;MENDOZA, 2008) and performance evaluation fairness (LATHAM et al, 2005;KELLY;VANCE;WEBB, 2010). We extend this literature by investigating whether organizational factors that affect the measurability of managerial performance are associated with perceptions of performance outcome controllability and whether perceived controllability is associated with performance evaluation fairness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our view is corroborated by Leventhal (1980) and Greenberg (1986 Baker, Gibbons and Murphy's (1994) agency-based model suggests that an employee's contribution to firm value is rarely completely captured by objective performance measures, and that superiors, who are well placed to observe subtleties of employee behavior, should use all relevant and private information to adjust for uncontrollable events. Accordingly, scholars advise organizations to use formal systems with caution, including performance evaluation systems, which might affect fairness perceptions (FOLGER;LEWIS, 1995;LATHAM et al, 2005;SHOLIHIN;PIKE, 2009). This leads to the following hypothesis: H3: Perceived outcome controllability is positively associated with perceptions of performance evaluation fairness.…”
Section: Outcome Controllability and Performance Evaluation Fairnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appraiser and employees sit together to discuss and review performance in a shared way to identify new objectives, development and training targets (DenHartog et al, 2004), guiding employees like a coach (Latham et al, 2005), motivating employees and societal aspect (Fletcher, 2001). …”
Section: Components Of Performance Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate that employees pursue more self-set goals, thus relieving managers from having to provide as much feedback as in other situations. Further, goal setting is by all accounts a coaching method, meaning that both employee and manager are equally responsible for the process, with both parties discussing work tasks and opportunities for personal growth (Latham, Almost, Mann, & Moore, 2005).…”
Section: Organizational Goal Setting and Job Loss Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%