2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(00)00242-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New developments in particle characterization by laser diffraction: size and shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
102
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
102
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are widely used for dense multiphase flows in industrial processes and in microstructures as well, for example for biological cell counting and sizing [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition to complex and expensive equipments, the main disadvantage of these techniques is their dependence on the visibility of the measurement volume and on the focal distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are widely used for dense multiphase flows in industrial processes and in microstructures as well, for example for biological cell counting and sizing [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In addition to complex and expensive equipments, the main disadvantage of these techniques is their dependence on the visibility of the measurement volume and on the focal distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Three LD and BET measurements of each powder were made, and the limiting size d for the 10% (d 10 ), 50% (d 50 ), and 90% (d 90 ) volume fractions of particles <d are given (Table I). [24][25][26] The morphology of titanium particles was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a FEI XL 30 Sirion (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) FEG instrument [Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)].…”
Section: A Powder Characterization and Preform Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17] Drawbacks of these methods are that models have to be assumed for the evaluation of the data, like cylindrical pores for MIP, and that the information is spatially not localized [18][19][20] ; moreover, some of the methods are destructive (MB, MIP). [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] BET and HP usually give results superior to MB and MIP and have the advantage of being nondestructive. Spatially localized information about porosity and Ti-particle distribution can be obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM), but 3D reconstruction from SEM images is tedious and model dependent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in water) causes laser beam dispersion. Furthermore, there are many cases, where laser diffraction is not a proper tool for measurement of dietary fiber, since it is typically for use with particles of oval shape (Ma et al, 2000). Automated static image analysis allows learning about not just the size, but also the shape of particles, which is a crucial aspect in measuring fibers of oblong shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%