2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
1,093
1
31

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,584 publications
(1,142 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
1,093
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…The four excluded patients included two lost to followup after prosthesis reimplantation (at 3 and 9 months with no known complications) and two who were deceased before 2 years (one before attempted prosthesis reimplantation and one 3 months after revision TKA). All patients met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection [26], with the most common infecting organisms being Staphylococcal species (Table 1); eight patients had a polymicrobial infection and four were culture negative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The four excluded patients included two lost to followup after prosthesis reimplantation (at 3 and 9 months with no known complications) and two who were deceased before 2 years (one before attempted prosthesis reimplantation and one 3 months after revision TKA). All patients met Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection [26], with the most common infecting organisms being Staphylococcal species (Table 1); eight patients had a polymicrobial infection and four were culture negative.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are presented as of the most recent [4], diabetes, smoking status, coronary artery disease, prior number of knee arthrotomies, prior extensor mechanism disruption, prior completed two-stage revision, skin defect size, surgical service performing flap (plastic surgery vs orthopaedics), knee procedure at the time of flap reconstruction, type of spacer used (articulating vs static) in patients who underwent resection TKA, and identity and antibiotic-resistance of infecting organism(s), were recorded. Patients were classified as having treatment failure if they experienced persistent or recurrent periprosthetic joint infection [26] and/or ultimately underwent reoperation, including removal of the prosthetic components, arthrodesis, or amputation. Individuals who retained their prosthesis without evidence of recurrent infection were classified as having a successful result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two typical clinical conditions diagnosed as a superficial infection were cellulitis and infection confined to skin and subcutaneous tissue. Deep infection was defined according to the criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society [19] and was managed by open débridement with insert change or two-staged exchange revision TKA. A surgical site infection, either superficial or deep, occurring within 1 year after TKA was considered to be positive for infectious complication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of at least four of six minor criteria was also proposed to suggest PJI. The six minor criteria proposed were elevated ESR and CRP, elevated synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, increased synovial fluid polymorphonuclear cell percentage, isolation of a pathogen from one culture only, presence of purulence, and positive microscopy of the frozen section of periprosthetic tissue samples [30]. We do not routinely utilize frozen section of the periarticular tissues, thus eliminating one of the six minor criteria proposed by the MSIS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have suggested different adjunctive criteria [5,27,36,38] to overcome shortcomings of bacteriologic culture, leading to discrepancy in their inclusion and exclusion criteria. To resolve this inconsistency, an expert panel from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) has reviewed existing evidence and published a set of diagnostic criteria for PJI [30]. This new definition integrates clinical, serologic, microbiologic, and histopathologic findings and joint aspirate analysis to distinguish between infected and aseptic failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%