2013
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-3796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Data Supporting Modified RECIST (mRECIST) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) guideline has introduced specific amendments to standard RECIST to address the unique complexities involved in the evaluation of tumor response in hepatocellular carcinoma. A growing amount of data suggests that mRECIST, designed for response assessment in clinical trials, may translate into a tool for clinical practice. Clin Cancer Res; 19(6); 1312–4. ©2013 AACR.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Modified-RECIST criteria proposed by the European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) were also used to evaluate response as a secondary endpoint of this study. 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified-RECIST criteria proposed by the European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) were also used to evaluate response as a secondary endpoint of this study. 8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) For contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, we evaluated the tumor response according to the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) protocol [13].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, numerous radiologic-pathologic studies were conducted with the goal of comparing enhancement-based uni- and bidimensional (one- and two-dimensional) criteria with pathologically estimated tumor necrosis (8,1315). An important benefit of these techniques is the simplicity and reproducibility of measurements, specifically when using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (16). However, by nature of one- and two-dimensional measurements, these methods assume that three-dimensional (3D) tumor growth or response to treatment occurs in a symmetric, spheric manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%