The Mojave-Sonora Megashear Hypothesis: Development, Assessment, and Alternatives 2005
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2393-0.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New data on the lithostratigraphy, detrital zircon and Nd isotope provenance, and paleogeographic setting of the El Antimonio Group, Sonora, Mexico

Abstract: The El Antimonio Group is herein proposed as a new lithostratigraphic unit that encompasses the Antimonio, Río Asunción, and Sierra de Santa Rosa Formations in a revised nomenclature from Lucas and Estep (1999b). The type section for the Antimonio, Río Asunción, and the lower part of the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formations is located in the Sierra del Álamo, whereas the representative upper part of the Sierra de Santa Rosa Formation is located in the mountains of same name in northwestern Sonora. The ~4.5-km-thick… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8, bottom) from strata transported northward into the Chinle-Dockum deposystem from sources distant \500 km to the south are dominated by a mixture of DZ grains derived from the Cordilleran magmatic arc (peak ages 220-245 Ma) and older grains derived from the Precambrian basement of the arc. Similar DZ populations are present in the forearc Antimonio Group (Gehrels and Stewart 1998) and Barranca Group (Gonzáléz-León et al 2005) deposited in northwest Sonora south of the trend of the Cordilleran arc (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Chinle-dockum Dzmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…8, bottom) from strata transported northward into the Chinle-Dockum deposystem from sources distant \500 km to the south are dominated by a mixture of DZ grains derived from the Cordilleran magmatic arc (peak ages 220-245 Ma) and older grains derived from the Precambrian basement of the arc. Similar DZ populations are present in the forearc Antimonio Group (Gehrels and Stewart 1998) and Barranca Group (Gonzáléz-León et al 2005) deposited in northwest Sonora south of the trend of the Cordilleran arc (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Chinle-dockum Dzmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Estos ambientes pudieron ser desplazados lateralmente durante el Jurásico Medio (Megashear Mojave -Sonora). La parte inferior de la Formación Antimonio (Triásico) sobreyace en discordancia a rocas del Paleozoico (unidad II; González-León et al, 2005). El contacto entre las formaciones Río Asunción (Cárnico -Nórico) y Sierra de Santa Rosa (Hettangiano -Toarciano) también es discordante (con ausencia de Rético), y en el contexto regional esta última formación subyace con discordancia a rocas más jóvenes.…”
Section: Sucesiones Del Triásico Superior Y Jurásico De Méxicounclassified
“…A Mesozoic sequence (continental or deltaic sandstone and carbonaceous shale including some coal layers) was deposited unconformably (Barranca Formation) over the allochthonous rocks (Wilson and Rocha, 1949;Alencaster-De Cserna, 1961;Stewart et al, 1991). In the Caborca region (at El Antimonio area), the Triassic-Jurassic sedimentary rocks exhibit marine signature and were deposited over paleozoic platform rocks (White and Guiza, 1949;González-León, 1997;González-León et al, 2005). A Jurassic volcanic arc composed of andesites, tuffs and rhyolites, occasionally metamorphosed to greenschist facies, is well documented in the Sonoran desert between Santa Ana and Sonoyta (Anderson and Silver, 1979;Corona, 1979), as well as in Cananea (Valentine, 1936;Wodzicki, 1995).…”
Section: The Pre-laramide Substratummentioning
confidence: 99%